Steam Turbine Section Control for Flexible Load and Stress Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The fixed structure of steam turbine controllers limits flexibility in operation, making it difficult to adapt to varying market requirements and physical boundary conditions, especially in terms of power, frequency, and thermal stress management.

Innovation Solution

Implementing individual part-turbine controllers for each section of the steam turbine, allowing independent regulation of power, pressure, and thermal stresses, with PID controllers managing turbine valves to operate in different modes such as power control, frequency control, and thermal stress management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed controller structure is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different operating modes and market requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller structureVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the steam turbine control system into multiple independent partial turbine controllers (3a, 3b, 3c), each responsible for controlling specific turbine stages. This segmentation allows each controller to operate independently with its own set of process variables and control strategies, enabling the system to adapt to different operating modes without requiring complex reconfiguration of the entire control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If individual partial turbine controllers are implemented for each turbine stage, then the adaptability to different operating modes improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal partial turbine controllers that can operate in multiple operating modes (power control, frequency control, speed control, pressure control) depending on the operational requirements. Each controller is designed to handle different control tasks and can be configured for various functions, reducing the need for multiple specialized controllers and thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If a fixed controller structure is used, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to limited flexibility in responding to boundary conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller structureVSAvoidresponse to boundary conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic reconfiguration of control parameters and operating modes for each partial turbine controller based on real-time boundary conditions and operational requirements. The controllers can adapt their control strategies, setpoints, and regulated variables dynamically, allowing the system to respond flexibly to changing conditions without requiring physical reconfiguration or complex manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3658753B1Steam turbine control
Publication Date: 2023.01.04 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3658753B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a steam turbine (1). The steam turbine (1) has at least two sub-turbines (2a, 2b, 2c, 5), wherein the steam turbine (1) is paired with a steam turbine controller (3) which has a sub-turbine controller (3a, 3b, 3c) for each of the sub-turbines (2a, 2b, 2c), and each sub-turbine controller (3a, 3b, 3c) compares respective target values with respective actual values of the respective sub-turbine (2a, 2b, 2c, 5) during operation in order to determine a respective control deviation for each sub-turbine (2a, 2b, 2c, 5).