Steel Plate Cutting Layout With Integrated Deburring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In plate mills, the cutting of steel plates to achieve straight edges and size reduction is labor-intensive due to manual cutting and deburring processes, which often result in burrs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

An automated cutting system with longitudinal and cross cutting units, equipped with torches and deburring devices, that can perform simultaneous cutting and deburring operations, reducing the need for manual labor and burr removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual cutting and deburring processes are used, then flexibility and simplicity are maintained, but productivity is low and labor intensity is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting and deburring efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines cutting and deburring operations into a single integrated automated system. The cutting unit with torches performs cutting while the deburring unit with deburring devices simultaneously removes burrs, eliminating the need for separate manual operations and significantly improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical cutting and deburring operations with automated systems. Cutting torches (thermal process) and automated deburring devices replace hand-held tools and manual labor, reducing labor intensity and increasing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional cutting methods are used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to burr formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge qualityVSAvoidcutting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting and deburring functions are merged into one coordinated system. The deburring unit is positioned to follow the cutting torch immediately, ensuring burrs are removed right after cutting, which guarantees high edge quality without requiring separate post-processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The deburring operation is performed immediately after cutting while the material is still in position. This preliminary deburring action prevents burrs from interfering with subsequent operations and ensures high manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If manual deburring is performed after cutting, then process simplicity is maintained, but loss of time increases due to separate operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal processing timeVSAvoidintegrated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges cutting and deburring into simultaneous operations. Both functions are performed in one coordinated pass through the material, eliminating the sequential time required for separate cutting and deburring operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting and deburring operations continue simultaneously without interruption. The deburring device follows the cutting torch continuously, maintaining productive action throughout the entire process and minimizing total processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If automated cutting systems are implemented, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operation efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is designed with multi-functionality, where a single integrated apparatus performs both cutting and deburring operations. This universal design improves productivity while managing complexity by combining functions rather than adding separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system is segmented into distinct functional units (cutting unit with torches, deburring unit with deburring devices, support units) that can independently perform their functions. This modular segmentation manages complexity while maintaining high productivity through coordinated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient, automated cutting and deburring of steel plates, producing burr-free pieces with reduced material waste and labor costs, improving the efficiency of plate size reduction processes.

Implementation Method 1

a laser or plasma arc torch is often used to cut steel plates, whereas an oxy-fuel (flame) cutting torch is typically used to cut plates of greater thicknesses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11173563B2Systems and methods for reducing the size of a material
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 ROZOT THIERRY
  • US11173563B2 patent drawing
  • US11173563B2 patent drawing
  • US11173563B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated systems and methods for making cuts in large materials, particularly to trim and reduce the sizes of steel plates and slabs and produce therefrom one or more reduced-size pieces, optionally with the ability to reduce or avoid the need to perform a separate deburring operation on the materials after undergoing such cuts. Such a system includes multiple support units aligned in a longitudinal direction of a foundation and longitudinal and cross cutting units translatable in the longitudinal direction for performing, respectively, longitudinal and lateral cuts in a material. The support units are independently translatable in the longitudinal direction and each support unit has a crossmember that extends in the lateral direction, is adapted to at least partially support the material, and is operable to be raised and lowered in the vertical direction while the material is supported by the crossmembers.