Steel Manufacturing Route Selection for CO2 Emission Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The steel industry faces challenges in reducing the carbon footprint of steel products beyond direct manufacturing emissions, as customers require steel products that meet both physical property and quality standards while minimizing CO2 emissions throughout their lifecycle.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to manufacture steel products by defining and comparing different manufacturing routes, calculating CO2 emissions for each route considering raw materials, energy sources, and processes, and producing the steel using the route with the lowest emissions, while optionally setting a maximum emission level and utilizing renewable energy sources and scrap materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If multiple manufacturing routes are defined and CO2 emissions are calculated for each route, then the carbon footprint of steel products is reduced, but the device complexity and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 emissionsVSAvoidmanufacturing route evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into multiple alternative routes, each with distinct CO2 emission profiles. The system divides the overall steel production into separate manufacturing pathways (e.g., Route 1 using conventional methods, Route 2 using green hydrogen-based direct reduction, Route 3 using electric arc furnaces with renewable energy) that can be independently evaluated and compared based on their carbon footprint characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the evaluation parameter from traditional cost and quality metrics to include CO2 emission calculations as a primary decision criterion. By introducing carbon footprint as a quantifiable parameter with associated pricing mechanisms, the invention transforms the manufacturing selection process to optimize for lower emissions while maintaining economic viability through carbon pricing and incentive structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If CO2 emissions are calculated considering all raw materials, energy sources and processes, then the carbon footprint accuracy is improved, but the measurement precision requirements and data collection complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 emissions measurementVSAvoidemissions data collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a universal CO2 emission calculation framework that can be applied across all steel manufacturing routes and processes. This multi-functional system handles diverse raw materials (iron ore, scrap metal, direct reduced iron), various energy sources (fossil fuels, renewable electricity, green hydrogen), and different manufacturing processes (blast furnace, electric arc furnace, basic oxygen furnace) through a unified emission accounting methodology that ensures consistency and comparability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where CO2 emission data from actual manufacturing processes is continuously collected, measured, and fed back into the calculation model. This feedback loop allows for verification of calculated emissions against actual measurements, enabling continuous improvement of measurement accuracy and providing real-time information for route optimization decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If steel products are produced according to the manufacturing route with the lowest CO2 emissions, then the carbon footprint is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and quality control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon footprintVSAvoidquality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamic quality control mechanisms that adapt to the specific characteristics of each manufacturing route. Rather than applying static quality standards, the system dynamically adjusts control parameters and inspection frequencies based on the selected route's emission profile, process variability, and inherent quality characteristics, ensuring that lower emission routes receive appropriate quality attention without unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary quality assessments and process optimizations before actual steel production begins. By pre-evaluating the quality implications of selecting low-CO2 manufacturing routes and implementing preparatory quality control measures, the invention prevents quality issues before they arise, thereby reducing the need for complex corrective actions during production while maintaining high quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240229171A9Manufacturing method of a steel product
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • US20240229171A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to manufacture a steel product in a steelmaking plant including several different tools, the method including the definition of at least two manufacturing routes using different tools and the calculation of the expected level of CO2 emissions associated to each of this defined manufacturing routes.