High-Strength Steel Sheet Microstructure for Stable Press Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high-strength steel sheets face challenges in achieving tensile strength of 780 MPa or more while maintaining excellent press formability, ductility, and stretch flange formability, with significant variations in these properties across the width direction, leading to cracking and reduced yield.

Innovation Solution

A steel sheet with a specific chemical composition and microstructure, including C: 0.05 to 0.20%, Si: 0.40 to 1.50%, Mn: 1.9 to 3.5%, and controlled fractions of polygonal ferrite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite, along with controlled cooling processes, to enhance stability and formability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of steel sheets is increased to achieve tensile strength of 780 MPa or more, then the fuel efficiency of automobiles is improved through weight reduction, but press formability deteriorates due to low ductility and low stretch flange formability causing cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidpress formability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling chemical composition parameters (C: 0.15-0.35%, Si: 0.70-1.50%, Mn: 1.50-3.00%) and microstructural parameters (area fractions of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite) to achieve a balance between strength and formability. The controlled cooling rates (2-50°C/s) also represent parameter changes that optimize the microstructure for both strength and press formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (polygonal ferrite, upper bainite, lower bainite, martensite, and retained austenite) with specific area fractions. This composite microstructure combines the ductility benefits of ferrite and retained austenite with the strength benefits of martensite and bainite, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the strength of steel sheets is increased, then the tensile strength reaches 780 MPa or more, but the yield ratio increases resulting in large springback after forming and lowered dimensional accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the yield ratio by adjusting chemical composition parameters (particularly C and Si content) and microstructural parameters (area fractions of different phases). By optimizing these parameters, the yield ratio is kept at 0.85 or less, which reduces springback and improves dimensional accuracy while maintaining high tensile strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates local quality differences by distributing different microstructural phases throughout the material. The retained austenite (3-15% area fraction) provides local ductility and TRIP effect in regions undergoing deformation, while the martensite and bainite provide overall strength, achieving both high strength and low springback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If steel sheets are increased in strength, then the tensile strength reaches 780 MPa or more, but the formability becomes noticeably variable in the width direction leading to easy occurrence of cracking during press forming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformability stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves homogeneity by controlling the uniform distribution of microstructural phases throughout the steel sheet width. The specified area fractions of ferrite (30-70%), bainite (10-50%), and retained austenite (3-15%) ensure consistent formability properties across the width direction, preventing cracking during press forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes in the controlled cooling process (cooling rates of 2-50°C/s) to ensure uniform microstructural transformation across the sheet width. This uniform transformation results in consistent formability properties throughout the material, eliminating the variability that causes cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If steel sheets are increased in strength, then the tensile strength reaches 780 MPa or more, but the material yield is lowered due to limited blanking positions necessary to ensure quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmaterial yield
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves homogeneous microstructural properties across the entire steel sheet width, eliminating the need to limit blanking positions to specific regions. The uniform distribution of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite ensures consistent formability throughout, allowing maximum utilization of the material and improving production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a steel sheet with tensile strength of 780 MPa or more, exhibiting excellent press formability, ductility, and stretch flange formability, with minimal variations in quality across the width, enabling improved material yield and complex part manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

the steel sheet including a steel microstructure in which: the area fraction of polygonal ferrite is 10% or more and 80% or less, the total area fraction of upper bainite, tempered martensite, and lower bainite is 10% or more and 70% or less, the volume fraction of retained austenite is 3% or more and 15% or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

TRIP steel sheets in which retained austenite is dispersed in the microstructure are developed by a technique aimed for improving the formability of high strength steel sheets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTRIP effect: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS20260078462A1Steel sheet, member, and methods for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 JFE STEEL CORP
  • US20260078462A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078462A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078462A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A steel sheet is disclosed. A related member, and methods for manufacturing them are also disclosed. The steel sheet has a specific chemical composition and a specific steel microstructure and is such that the total area fraction of quenched martensite and retained austenite each having an aspect ratio of 3 or less and an equivalent circular diameter of 2.0 μm or more is 20% or less relative to the total area fraction of quenched martensite and retained austenite, and the area fraction of a C-enriched region with a C concentration of 0.5 mass % or more (Sc≥0.5) is 20% or less relative to the entire microstructure.