Steel Sheet Microstructure for Shape-Fixability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high strength steel sheets with tensile strengths of 590 MPa or more face challenges in shape-fixability and dimensional precision due to increased yield stress and decreased ductility, leading to springback and poor formability during press forming.

Innovation Solution

A steel sheet with a chemical composition of C: 0.040% to 0.400%, Si: 0.01% to 2.50%, Mn: 0.10% to 4.00%, and controlled microstructure, including ferrite, residual austenite, martensite, bainite, and pearlite, is produced using a method that involves controlled cooling and heating rates, hot rolling, and annealing to achieve a uniform distribution of Mn and hardness, reducing the variation in work hardening across the sheet.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of the steel is increased to reduce vehicle body weight and improve safety, then the tensile strength is improved, but the yield stress increases and shape-fixability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidshape-fixability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a non-uniform microstructure with different phases (ferrite, martensite, bainite) distributed throughout the steel sheet. The ferrite regions provide ductility and work hardening capability, while martensite regions provide high strength. This local differentiation of material properties allows the steel to exhibit both high tensile strength and good shape-fixability, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The steel sheet is designed as a composite material containing multiple phases (ferrite, martensite, and bainite) with specific area ratios. The ferrite phase (10-90% area ratio) provides ductility and work hardening, the martensite phase (3-50% area ratio) provides high strength, and the bainite phase (0-30% area ratio) contributes to overall strength and toughness. This composite microstructure enables the steel to achieve both high tensile strength (590 MPa or more) and improved shape-fixability during press forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the strength of the steel is increased, then the tensile strength is improved, but the ductility decreases and fracture is likely to occur during press forming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a non-uniform microstructure with different phases (ferrite, martensite, bainite) distributed throughout the steel sheet. The ferrite regions provide ductility and work hardening capability, while martensite regions provide high strength. This local differentiation of material properties allows the steel to exhibit both high tensile strength and good shape-fixability, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The steel sheet is designed as a composite material containing multiple phases (ferrite, martensite, and bainite) with specific area ratios. The ferrite phase (10-90% area ratio) provides ductility and work hardening, the martensite phase (3-50% area ratio) provides high strength, and the bainite phase (0-30% area ratio) contributes to overall strength and toughness. This composite microstructure enables the steel to achieve both high tensile strength (590 MPa or more) and improved shape-fixability during press forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If the yield stress is increased to maintain high strength, then the tensile strength is maintained, but the work hardening capability decreases and dimensional precision worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield stressVSAvoiddimensional precision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a non-uniform microstructure with different phases (ferrite, martensite, bainite) distributed throughout the steel sheet. The ferrite regions provide ductility and work hardening capability, while martensite regions provide high strength. This local differentiation of material properties allows the steel to exhibit both high tensile strength and good shape-fixability, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The steel sheet is designed as a composite material containing multiple phases (ferrite, martensite, and bainite) with specific area ratios. The ferrite phase (10-90% area ratio) provides ductility and work hardening, the martensite phase (3-50% area ratio) provides high strength, and the bainite phase (0-30% area ratio) contributes to overall strength and toughness. This composite microstructure enables the steel to achieve both high tensile strength (590 MPa or more) and improved shape-fixability during press forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If the C content or Mn content is increased to achieve high strength, then the tensile strength is improved, but the segregation during casting increases and work hardening uniformity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidwork hardening uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention specifies precise compositional ranges (C: 0.040-0.400%, Si: 0.01-2.50%, Mn: 0.10-4.00%, Al: 0.010-1.500%) to optimize both strength and segregation control. These parameter changes enable the steel to achieve high tensile strength while maintaining compositional stability and uniform work hardening characteristics throughout the sheet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The steel sheet is designed as a composite material containing multiple phases (ferrite, martensite, and bainite) with specific area ratios. The ferrite phase (10-90% area ratio) provides ductility and work hardening, the martensite phase (3-50% area ratio) provides high strength, and the bainite phase (0-30% area ratio) contributes to overall strength and toughness. This composite microstructure enables the steel to achieve both high tensile strength (590 MPa or more) and improved shape-fixability during press forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting steel sheet exhibits improved shape-fixability, dimensional precision, and workability, making it suitable for press working applications while maintaining high tensile strength.

Implementation Method 1

a microstructure in a range from a 1/8 thickness position in a sheet thickness direction from a surface of the steel sheet to a 3/8 thickness position in the sheet thickness direction from the surface includes, by area fraction, ferrite: 10% to 97%, residual austenite and martensite: 3% to 90%, bainite: 0% to 87%, and pearlite: 0% to 10%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

since the shape of a steel is formed through work hardening during press forming

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork hardening: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12247263B2Steel sheet and method for producing same
Publication Date: 2025.03.11 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

AI summary

A steel sheet of the present invention is a steel sheet having a predetermined chemical composition and containing at least ferrite, residual austenite, and/or martensite in a microstructure, and furthermore, is a steel sheet in which, in a plane parallel to a rolled surface, an average distance between centers of high Mn regions adjacent to each other is 1.00 mm or less, a density DA of the high Mn regions at a sheet width center portion and a density DB of the high Mn regions at a ¼ position from a sheet width end portion satisfy a relationship of 0.77≤DA/DB≤1.30, a ratio of an average hardness of the high Mn regions to an average hardness of the low Mn regions is 1.1 to 2.0, and a difference between an average of a top 5% and an average of a bottom 5% of Mn contents in the low Mn regions is 0.3% or more.