Steel Wire Cooling Process for Consistent Drawability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for heat treating steel wires, particularly those with diameters between 3.5 mm and 20 mm, often result in inconsistent drawability and brittle behavior due to unwanted metallic structures like martensite or bainite, and fail to reliably control tensile strength and microstructure.

Innovation Solution

A controlled cooling method involving multiple coolant baths with a stabilizing additive and impinging liquid to create a steam film, followed by air cooling to prevent turbulence, ensuring a stable transformation from austenite to pearlite, allowing for precise control of cooling rates and microstructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cooling methods (direct water cooling or air cooling) are used for steel wires with diameter 3.5-20mm, then cooling speed can be controlled, but inconsistent drawability and brittle behavior occur due to unwanted metallic structures like martensite or bainite

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of drawability and mechanical propertiesVSAvoiduniformity of metallic microstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process is divided into multiple sequential stages: initial rapid cooling stage, intermediate cooling stage, and final cooling stage. Each stage uses different cooling media (water spray, air, water) and cooling rates to progressively transform the microstructure, ensuring complete avoidance of martensite and bainite while achieving uniform pearlite

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic alternation between different cooling methods and media throughout the cooling process. This includes switching between water spray and air cooling, and between different water temperatures, to maintain optimal cooling rates that prevent unwanted phase transformations while ensuring uniform microstructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Strength

If high cooling speed is applied to achieve fine pearlite structure, then tensile strength is improved, but formation of martensite or bainite occurs causing brittleness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidformation of brittle metallic structures
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies cooling parameters including cooling rate, water temperature, and exposure time across different cooling stages. By precisely controlling these parameters, the process achieves rapid enough cooling to form fine pearlite for high tensile strength, while staying within the safe parameter range that avoids martensite and bainite formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling process incorporates monitoring and adjustment mechanisms to maintain optimal cooling rates. This ensures that the cooling speed remains within the range that produces fine pearlite without exceeding the threshold that would cause brittle phase formation, allowing consistent achievement of high strength without brittleness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If alternating water and air cooling periods are used for wires with diameter less than 2.8mm, then formation of martensite or bainite is avoided, but the process complexity increases and cooling control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavoidance of unwanted metallic structuresVSAvoidcomplexity of cooling process control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a multi-stage cooling process that can handle various wire diameters (3.5-20mm) with a single integrated system. The same basic apparatus configuration with adjustable parameters can process different wire sizes, eliminating the need for completely different cooling systems for different diameter ranges and reducing overall process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves a more reliable and consistent transformation to a fine pearlitic structure, enhancing the mechanical properties and stability of steel wires by preventing the formation of undesirable structures like martensite or bainite, thus improving tensile strength and drawability.

Implementation Method 1

The bath liquid and the multiple previously heated and substantially straight steel wires create a steam film around each steel wire itself

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam film formation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the wire is subjected to uniform and stable film-boiled cooling along its entire immersion length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFilm boiling: Boiling

Implementation Method 3

Directing an impinging liquid immersed inside the first coolant bath/baths towards the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires over a certain length L along individual path/paths, to cool down the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 4

Guiding the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires along individual path/paths out of the first coolant bath/baths to be further cooled down in air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 5

the substantially straight steel wire/wires are subjected to a cooling transformation from austenite to pearlite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 6

cooling the wires to a chosen temperature held for a sufficient period for generally isothermal decomposition of the austenite to be completed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIsothermal decomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Data Source

PatentEP3568500B1Lead-free patenting process
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 NV BEKAERT SA
  • EP3568500B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3568500B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3568500B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method of controlled cooling of one or multiple previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires of diameter more than 2.8 mm to a predetermined temperature range, comprises the steps: - guiding the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires along individual path/paths through one or multiple first coolant bath/baths comprising a bath liquid comprising water and a stabilizing additive. The bath liquid and the multiple previously heated and substantially straight steel wires create a steam film around each steel wire itself along each individual path; - directing an impinging liquid immersed inside the first coolant bath/baths towards the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires over a certain length L along individual path/paths, to cool down the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires, the impinging liquid decreases the thickness of the steam film or destabilizes the steam film, thereby increasing the speed of cooling over the length L along individual path/paths; - guiding the previously heated and substantially straight steel wire/wires along individual path/paths out of the first coolant bath/baths to be further cooled down in air; - after the further cooling in air, guiding the previously heated, substantially straight steel wire/wires along individual path/paths through one or multiple second coolant bath/baths. In the method, the substantially straight steel wire/wires are subjected to a cooling transformation from austenite to pearlite.