Simulation-Based Tolerance Zones for Steer-By-Wire Samples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a systematic procedure to ascertain meaningful parameter tolerances for product samples, leading to potential deviations in system behavior between prototypes and manufactured products, especially in steer-by-wire and highly automated driving steering systems, which are subject to stricter normative requirements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using dissimilarity metrics (gap, ν-gap, and L2 metrics) to calculate a tolerance zone around a target parameter sample, ensuring that product specimens maintain a tolerable system behavior similarity by determining individual parameter tolerances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If parameter tolerances are defined based on expert knowledge, then the selection process is simple and quick, but the system behavior dissimilarity between product samples and specimens may be significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for tolerance definitionVSAvoidsystem behavior similarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the tolerance definition process from expert-based qualitative judgment to a systematic quantitative approach by calculating dissimilarity metrics (gap metric, ν-gap metric, L2 metric) between product samples and specimens. This enables objective determination of parameter tolerances that guarantee acceptable system behavior similarity while reducing time loss through automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If parameter tolerances are made strict, then system behavior similarity between product samples and specimens is improved, but production costs increase unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem behavior similarityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by determining tolerances only for parameters that have significant influence on system behavior, identified through sensitivity analysis. Parameters with low influence can have looser tolerances, avoiding unnecessary production costs while maintaining adequate system behavior similarity for critical parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If parameter tolerances are made lax, then production costs are reduced, but significant deviations in system behavior between product samples and specimens occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidsystem behavior similarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically determines optimal parameter tolerances by calculating dissimilarity metrics and identifying the boundary where system behavior similarity becomes unacceptable. This enables cost-effective tolerance selection that avoids both excessive strictness and insufficient control, achieving the optimal balance between production cost and system behavior similarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a systematic procedure for tolerance ascertainment is implemented, then the system behavior dissimilarity is controlled, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem behavior similarity controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual expert evaluation processes with automated computational methods using dissimilarity metrics (gap metric, ν-gap metric, L2 metric). This substitution transforms a potentially complex expert-based process into a systematic computational procedure that provides objective, repeatable results while actually reducing overall process complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250378218A1Systematic tolerance ascertainment for samples of a series product
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250378218A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378218A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378218A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for ascertaining a tolerance zone in an operational design domain (ODD) around a target parameter sample of a parameterizable simulation model for a product, in particular a steer-by-wire steering system and/or a steering system for highly automated driving. The method includes: calculating a dissimilarity metric based on each pair of a plurality of pairs, wherein each pair comprises a parameterized simulation model associated with the target parameter sample and a parameterized simulation model of a plurality of parameterized simulation models, wherein each pair yields a distance, thereby resulting in a plurality of distances; optionally wherein the dissimilarity metric is based on a gap metric, a ν-gap metric and/or an L2 metric; and determining the tolerance zone in the ODD around the target parameter sample based on the plurality of distances and on a maximum tolerable distance.