Steerable Antenna With Fixed Actuators and Dual-Axis Reflector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Steerable antennas for wide scan angles face challenges with the 'key-hole effect' or singularity at nadir, requiring high-speed actuators and complex drive electronics, and existing solutions either eliminate rotary joints with additional weight and complexity or retain them with limited pointing range and cost issues.

Innovation Solution

A steerable antenna configuration with fixed rotary actuators on a stationary support structure, eliminating the need for RF rotary joints and movable harnesses, allowing beam steering over a full hemisphere without singularities, using a reflector assembly with perpendicular axes of rotation and a gear assembly for smooth movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rotary joints are eliminated to reduce signal loss and improve reliability, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to alternative mechanisms required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna system reliabilityVSAvoidantenna mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes rotary joints from the antenna system entirely, extracting the problematic component that caused signal loss and reliability issues. Instead of using traditional rotary joints to enable rotation, the invention uses a fixed feed horn with a reflector assembly that rotates without requiring signal-carrying rotary connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical RF rotary joint system with a purely mechanical rotation system for the reflector assembly. The feed horn remains stationary while the reflector rotates mechanically, eliminating the need for rotary joints that combine mechanical rotation with RF signal transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If nadir-pointing azimuth rotation axis is used for wide scan coverage, then coverage area is improved, but key-hole effect occurs causing tracking failure near singularity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan coverage areaVSAvoidtarget tracking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning of the feed horn relative to the rotation axis, placing it off-axis to eliminate the singularity problem. This asymmetric configuration ensures that the reflector never needs to point exactly at nadir, avoiding the key-hole effect while maintaining wide scan coverage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a secondary rotation axis perpendicular to the primary azimuth axis, adding a dimensional degree of freedom. This dual-axis rotation system allows the reflector to achieve wide scan coverage without relying on nadir-pointing, thereby eliminating the singularity issue associated with single-axis nadir-pointing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If high-speed actuators are used to overcome key-hole effect, then target tracking is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget tracking speedVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prevents the key-hole effect from occurring in the first place by using asymmetric feed horn positioning and dual-axis rotation, rather than trying to compensate for it with high-speed actuators. This preliminary design approach eliminates the need for excessive actuator speed while maintaining tracking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using high-speed actuators to overcome the singularity problem, the patent inverts the approach by designing a system where the singularity never occurs. The asymmetric configuration and dual-axis rotation work together to eliminate the need for high-speed compensation, reducing actuator complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If RF rotary joints are retained for axis rotation, then ease of operation is maintained, but signal loss and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxis rotation capabilityVSAvoidRF signal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes RF rotary joints from the system, extracting the component that causes signal loss. The stationary feed horn eliminates the need for RF signals to pass through rotating joints, thereby eliminating the associated signal attenuation and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2996197B1Wide scan steerable antenna
Publication Date: 2021.10.20 MACDONALD DETTWILER & ASSOC INC
  • EP2996197B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2996197B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2996197B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A steerable antenna configuration (10) having all actuators (28, 30) and the feed source (16) mounted on a stationary side of the antenna thereby eliminating the need of having to supply power and/or communication signal through a rotation mechanism. A first actuator (28) rotates a reflector assembly (22) about a first axis (24), and a second actuator (30) rotates at least a main reflector (32) of the reflector assembly (22) about a second axis (26) perpendicular to the first axis (24). The second axis (26) is rotatable about the first axis (24) via the first actuator (28).