Rotary Steerable System Steering Actuation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotary steerable systems in downhole drilling operations face challenges in controlling the extension and retraction of hydraulically actuated pads, leading to suboptimal wellbore position control, steering efficiency, and hole quality.

Innovation Solution

A method for drilling a subterranean wellbore that involves rotating a bottom hole assembly with a rotary steerable tool or steerable drill bit, using toolface demands to compute open and close toolface angles for valve actuation, and adjusting these angles based on measured rotation rates and toolface errors to improve steering precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rotary steerable systems use hydraulically actuated pads to steer, then the system can operate in a wide range of drilling operations, but the control of pad extension and retraction is insufficient leading to suboptimal wellbore position control and steering efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore position controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback control mechanism where actual toolface measurements are continuously compared with demanded toolface values. The controller computes errors and adjusts valve actuation timing and duration to minimize these errors, enabling precise wellbore position control while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical steering control with an electronically controlled hydraulic system. Digital controllers and electronic valves substitute for traditional mechanical linkages, allowing for more precise and adaptable control of pad extension and retraction timing based on real-time measurements and computed errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the pad extension and retraction timing is not precisely controlled, then the system operation is simple, but steering efficiency and hole quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering efficiencyVSAvoidvalve actuation timing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller computes optimal valve actuation timing in advance based on demanded toolface values and measured rotation rates. The system determines the precise moments when pads should extend and retract before these actions occur, allowing for optimized steering efficiency while accounting for the rotational motion of the drill string.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts valve actuation parameters based on real-time measurements of rotation rate and actual toolface orientation. The controller continuously updates the timing and duration of pad extension and retraction to maintain optimal steering efficiency as drilling conditions change, rather than using fixed predetermined timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If toolface measurements are continuously monitored and processed, then directional control precision is improved, but the measurement and control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolface measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures actual toolface orientation and feeds these measurements back to the controller. The controller compares measured values with demanded values, computes errors, and adjusts valve actuation accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves directional control precision by constantly correcting deviations from the desired wellbore trajectory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If the valve actuation is precisely controlled based on rotation rate and toolface angles, then hole quality is improved, but the control system complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic valve actuation synchronized with the rotation rate of the drill string. Pads are extended and retracted at specific phases of the rotation cycle based on computed timing, creating a periodic steering action that maintains consistent hole quality. This periodic control approach improves manufacturing precision while managing energy consumption through rhythmic, predictable actuation patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enhances steering efficiency, achieves better directional control, and improves overall hole quality by precisely controlling the extension and retraction of steering pads during drilling.

Implementation Method 1

hydraulically actuated pads (or blades) to steer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS12320256B2Steering actuation feedback for a rotary steerable system
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US12320256B2 patent drawing
  • US12320256B2 patent drawing
  • US12320256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for drilling a subterranean wellbore includes rotating a bottom hole assembly (BHA) in the wellbore to drill. The BHA includes a rotary steerable tool or a steerable drill bit having at least one external pad that extends radially outward into contact with a wall of the wellbore and thereby steers while drilling. A toolface demand is received and processed to compute open and close toolface angles for opening and closing a valve that actuates the steering pad. The rotation rate of the BHA is measured and processed to compute times for opening and closing the valve. The valve is opened and closed at the computed times and toolface angles at which the valve opens and closes are measured. The open and close toolface angles are compared with the measured toolface values to obtain a toolface error which is then processed to compute new open and close toolface angles.