Steering Angle Plausibility Check for Driverless Vehicle Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driverless transport vehicles face challenges in reliably detecting vehicle movement using a minimum number of encoders that do not have to be fail-safe, particularly in omnidirectional vehicles with complex kinematics, where ensuring safe navigation and collision avoidance is critical.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that utilize plausibility checks between steering angle signals and travel distance signals from individual wheels, allowing for fail-safe movement detection without the need for complex or redundant encoder systems, by assuming consistent wheel control and using tolerance values to compensate for minor deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fail-safe encoders or redundant encoders are used per wheel to reliably detect wheel movement, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of wheel movement detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of encoder systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses steering angle signals from steered wheels as a copy or substitute for direct encoding of all wheel movements. By detecting steering angles of steered wheels and using these signals to infer the movement state of non-steered wheels through plausibility checks, the system achieves reliable movement detection without requiring fail-safe encoders on every wheel, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation unit performs plausibility checks by comparing steering angle signals from multiple steered wheels against each other and against expected kinematic relationships. This feedback mechanism validates the consistency of wheel movement data and detects anomalies, providing reliable safety verification without requiring redundant encoders on all wheels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If a minimum number of non-fail-safe encoders are used to detect wheel movement, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of movement detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of encoder systemsVSAvoidsafety of movement detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical redundancy of multiple fail-safe encoders with a computational/electronic solution. Instead of using redundant physical sensing components, the system uses software-based plausibility checks that compare steering angle signals and validate them against the vehicle's known kinematic model, achieving safety through intelligent evaluation rather than physical redundancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The steered wheels themselves provide the information needed for safety verification through their steering angle signals. By monitoring the steering angles of steered wheels and checking their consistency with each other and with the vehicle's kinematic constraints, the system makes the wheels self-verify their own movement state without requiring external redundant sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If plausibility checks are performed on steering angle signals from steered wheels, then reliability of movement detection is improved without additional encoders, but device complexity increases due to evaluation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of movement determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation unit performs multiple functions using the same steering angle signals: it determines vehicle position, calculates vehicle speed, verifies safety conditions, and detects anomalies. By making the evaluation unit multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate systems for each function, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being monitored from direct wheel speed/position (which would require encoders on all wheels) to steering angle of steered wheels. This parameter change allows the use of existing steering sensors for multiple purposes including safety verification, avoiding the need for additional complex sensing hardware while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4151585A1Driverless transport vehicle and device and method for securely detecting a vehicle movement
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 SICK AG
  • EP4151585A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4151585A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4151585A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a driverless transport vehicle (10) with at least three wheels (12, 14, 16, 18) designed as individual wheels. At least two of the wheels are individually steered and each has a steering device. At least some of the wheels are driven so that their rotational speeds are controlled. The vehicle further comprises a steering angle detection device (28) for detecting the steering angles (α, β, γ, δ) of the at least two steered wheels and for outputting corresponding steering angle signals, as well as an evaluation unit (32) to which the steering angle signals are supplied. The evaluation unit has a plausibility check unit (34) that performs a plausibility check of the steering angle signals and outputs a safety signal if the plausibility check is unsuccessful.