Vehicle Steering Control System Non-Interference Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems that manage multiple control quantities face challenges in achieving non-interference control due to mutual interference, particularly in complex systems like vehicle steering control, where it is difficult to detect and adjust for disturbances in real time, leading to time-consuming trial-and-error adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A control system comprising feedback controllers and a non-interference controller that designates combinations of inputs and outputs to apply non-interference control, reducing mutual interference by calculating operation quantities based on target and current values, and using PID control to adjust inputs and outputs effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If non-interference control is implemented to reduce mutual interference between control quantities, then control precision is improved, but the complexity of calculating transfer functions and adjusting actuators increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into multiple independent SISO (single-input single-output) control loops, each handling a specific combination of input and output. By designating specific pairings (e.g., first input with first output, second input with second output), the complex MIMO non-interference control problem is divided into simpler, manageable segments that can be controlled independently, reducing calculation complexity while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If trial-and-error adjustment of actuators is performed to achieve non-interference control, then control performance is improved, but the time and man hours required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designates specific combinations of inputs and outputs in advance before actual control operation begins. This preliminary designation of control pairings establishes a predetermined control structure that eliminates the need for time-consuming trial-and-error adjustments during system operation or commissioning, thereby improving reliability while reducing the time and manual effort required for setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If all combinations of inputs and outputs are considered for non-interference control, then control accuracy is improved, but the number of combinations to consider becomes unmanageably large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidnumber of combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and designates only the essential or critical combinations of input-output pairs that need to be controlled, rather than considering all possible combinations. This selective extraction of important control relationships reduces the number of combinations from potentially n×m possibilities to a manageable subset, maintaining control accuracy for the most important variables while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9783229B2Vehicle steering control system
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 DENSO CORP
  • US9783229B2 patent drawing
  • US9783229B2 patent drawing
  • US9783229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system calculates inputs to a control target that has m inputs and n outputs (m=n, each of m and n is a natural number that is more than one), while designating a plurality of combinations of the inputs and the outputs. A feedback controller calculates, with respect to each designated combination, a control input to a non-interference controller based on a difference between a target value and a current value of the control quantity to make the current value follow the target value. The non-interference controller executes, with respect to each designated combination, a non-interference control to reduce influence due to mutual interference between n control quantities. This reduces the number of combinations of the inputs and the outputs, the combinations whose mutual interference needs considering; thereby, the non-interference control may be easily achieved.