Steering-Linked Speed Control for Heavy-Duty Construction Carts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small, self-propelled carts used in construction sites for transporting concrete are prone to tipping over due to irregular terrain, excessive speed, and sharp turns, leading to instability and potential rollovers, especially when heavily loaded.

Innovation Solution

A self-propelled, steerable cart with a hydraulic drive system and a hand-grip controlled speed reduction mechanism that automatically limits speed in response to excessive steering displacements, using a cable linkage system to pivot the throttle lever and reduce engine power, ensuring stability during sharp turns and on uneven terrain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the cart travels at high speed, then productivity is improved, but stability deteriorates causing tipping over

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport speedVSAvoidcart stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system using a steering angle sensor that continuously monitors the steering input and provides signals to a control unit. When excessive steering angles are detected, the control unit automatically reduces engine speed, creating a closed-loop feedback mechanism that maintains stability while allowing normal high-speed operation. This resolves the contradiction by dynamically adjusting speed based on actual steering conditions rather than imposing constant speed limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical speed limiting mechanisms with an electronically controlled system. Instead of using mechanical linkages or governors to limit speed, the invention uses electronic sensors, a control unit, and electronic throttle control to achieve speed regulation. This substitution allows for more precise and adaptive speed control that responds to actual operating conditions, resolving the stability-speed contradiction more effectively than mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the cart makes sharp turns, then maneuverability is improved, but stability deteriorates causing rollover

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering capabilityVSAvoidcart stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The steering angle sensor provides continuous feedback to the control unit about the magnitude of steering input. When the sensor detects steering angles exceeding a predetermined threshold, the control unit automatically reduces engine speed to prevent rollover. This feedback mechanism allows the cart to maintain full maneuverability during normal operation while automatically stabilizing during sharp turns, resolving the contradiction between steering capability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the cart is heavily loaded, then productivity is improved, but stability deteriorates causing tilt and tip

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacityVSAvoidcart stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs the cart's own weight and hydraulic system as counterbalancing elements. The hydraulic lift cylinder and cargo bed configuration create a counterweight effect that helps stabilize the cart when heavily loaded. Additionally, the electronic speed control system compensates for the reduced stability by automatically reducing speed during maneuvers that would be particularly dangerous when heavily loaded, effectively using both mechanical counterweight principles and electronic control to resolve the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Speed

If conventional speed control systems are used, then speed limitation is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the speed control function into the existing electronic throttle control system of the engine, making the speed limitation feature a byproduct of the engine's own control architecture rather than a separate mechanical system. The steering angle sensor and control unit serve multiple functions including normal engine management and stability control, reducing overall system complexity while achieving effective speed limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The cart maintains stability and safety by automatically reducing speed during sharp turns and on uneven terrain, preventing tilting and rollovers, even when heavily loaded, thus enhancing safety and maneuverability on construction sites.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic drive system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic transmission: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

using a cable linkage system to pivot the throttle lever and reduce engine power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical linkage: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS10384704B2Steering responsive speed-controlled buggy
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 ALLEN ENGINEERING CORP
  • US10384704B2 patent drawing
  • US10384704B2 patent drawing
  • US10384704B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steerable, self-propelled cart for safely delivering heavy loads, such as concrete, within job sites with unlevel, irregular, or sloped terrain. A cargo bucket is tiltable over front drive wheels for transporting and dumping cargo. Hydraulic drive motors driven by a hydraulic pump propel rear wheels at a selectable speed. Steering handlebars rotate a steering column that turns the rear wheels. A throttle cable extending from the handlebars controls the throttle setting by pivoting a throttle lever mounted on the hydraulic pump. Limiting linkages extend from flanges on an anchor bracket secured to the steering column to a bridge on the throttle lever. As the steering column rotates, the limit linkages are wound partially about it, pivoting the throttle lever by pulling on the bridge, reducing pump speed. Heavy steering displacements will retract the throttle lever to reduce cart speed notwithstanding the previous speed setting chosen by the operator via the cable.