Steering Lock Fragile Part Auxiliary Lock Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steering lock devices may experience a time difference between the breaking of the breaking structure and the functioning of the auxiliary lock mechanism, leading to potential premature movement of the lock body to the lock position before the auxiliary lock member engages, which can compromise the secure functioning of the auxiliary lock structure during separation.

Innovation Solution

A steering lock device design featuring a lock member with a hanger and lock body linked by an L-shaped protrusion, an auxiliary lock mechanism with a biased auxiliary lock member, and a fragile part on the guide part to reduce load resistance, ensuring the auxiliary lock mechanism functions reliably by delaying the disconnection of the linkage portion and allowing additional time for the auxiliary lock member to engage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the breaking structure is designed to break under excessive external force, then driver protection is improved, but the auxiliary lock mechanism may not function reliably due to time delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauxiliary lock mechanism functioningVSAvoidtime difference between breaking and auxiliary lock engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The holding member is preliminarily engaged with the auxiliary lock member to hold it in the stand-by position before the breaking structure actually breaks. This preliminary engagement ensures that when the breaking structure fails, the auxiliary lock member is already positioned and ready to immediately engage with the lock body, eliminating the time delay between breaking and auxiliary lock activation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The holding member acts as an intermediary mechanism between the breaking structure and the auxiliary lock member. It bridges the time gap by maintaining the auxiliary lock member in a pre-positioned state, ensuring seamless transition from breaking to auxiliary locking without direct causal connection between the two events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the lock body is allowed to move freely when the breaking structure breaks, then the auxiliary lock mechanism can engage, but the lock body may move to the lock position before the auxiliary lock member engages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauxiliary lock engagementVSAvoidlock body movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The holding member applies a preliminary constraining force on the auxiliary lock member, preventing it from moving prematurely when the breaking structure fails. This preliminary anti-action counteracts any tendency of the lock body to move to the lock position before the auxiliary lock member is ready to engage, ensuring controlled and timely engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Strength

If the frame is made strong to prevent separation, then structural integrity is improved, but the auxiliary lock mechanism cannot function when separation is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidframe separation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into a breakable structure that can separate under excessive force, with the breaking structure being a distinct component from the rest of the frame. This segmentation allows the frame to maintain overall strength while having a designated weak point that can separate to trigger the auxiliary lock mechanism when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The breaking structure is designed with local quality differences - it has lower strength at specific locations compared to the rest of the frame. This localized weakness allows the frame to remain strong overall while having a controlled separation point that enables the auxiliary lock mechanism to function when separation occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures the auxiliary lock mechanism functions certainly by reducing the load required for separation, delaying the disconnection of the linkage, and allowing the auxiliary lock member to move to the auxiliary lock position effectively, thereby enhancing the secure operation of the steering lock device.

Implementation Method 1

an auxiliary lock member (61) arranged on the other of the guide part or the lock body to be biased toward the auxiliary lock receiving part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10093276B2Steering lock device
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 ALPHA
  • US10093276B2 patent drawing
  • US10093276B2 patent drawing
  • US10093276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fragile part (15) which is set to have lower load resistance than other positions of a frame (10) is provided on a guide part (12) at a position that overlaps with a linkage portion (50a) between a hanger (52) and a lock body (51) of a lock member (50) positioned in a steering lock release position.