Smart Vehicle Steering Control With Parallel Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current man-machine coordinated steering systems for smart vehicles face challenges in providing a real-time optimal front wheel steering angle based on risk assessment, hindering their widespread adoption due to complexities in traffic environments and driver behavior analysis.

Innovation Solution

A parallel computing method is developed to optimize front wheel steering and longitudinal acceleration by building a lateral kinetic equation model, employing a parallel computing architecture, and using fuzzy logic to compute driving weights, thereby enabling real-time control of the steering system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional sequential computing methods are used for man-machine coordinated steering control, then the control system can provide comprehensive risk assessment and optimal steering angle calculation, but the computing time is too long to achieve real-time control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidcomputing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into multiple independent computing modules: risk assessment module, prediction model module, target function module, and optimization module. Each module processes specific tasks independently through parallel computing, thereby reducing overall computing time while maintaining comprehensive control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential single-thread computing to parallel multi-thread computing architecture, adding a temporal dimension to the processing. Multiple computations that were previously executed one after another are now executed simultaneously across multiple processing units, dramatically reducing computing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If real-time parallel computing is implemented for optimal steering angle calculation, then the computing speed is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into functionally independent modules that can be developed, tested, and maintained separately. This modular architecture reduces system complexity by organizing complex parallel computing tasks into manageable units with well-defined interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a coordinate transformation module as an intermediary between the prediction model and the optimization module. This intermediary handles the complex data format conversions and coordinate system transformations, isolating the complexity from the core parallel computing algorithms and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive risk assessment and prediction models are used for safe driving control, then the driving safety is improved, but the computational burden increases and real-time performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential and most critical risk factors from comprehensive environmental data, such as key obstacle positions, relative velocities, and critical distance metrics. By focusing computational resources on these extracted critical parameters rather than processing all available sensor data, the system maintains high driving safety while reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the complexity and detail level of risk assessment parameters based on driving conditions. In normal driving conditions, simplified parameter models are used to reduce computational burden, while in critical situations, more comprehensive parameter analysis is activated to ensure safety, thereby optimizing the balance between safety and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11760349B2Parallel computing method for man-machine coordinated steering control of smart vehicle based on risk assessment
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 TONGJI UNIV
  • US11760349B2 patent drawing
  • US11760349B2 patent drawing
  • US11760349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parallel computing method for man-machine coordinated steering control of a smart vehicle based on risk assessment is provided, comprising the following steps: building a lateral kinetic equation model of a vehicle; building a target function by targeting at minimizing an offset distance of a vehicle driving track from a lane center line and making a change in a front wheel steering angle and a longitudinal acceleration as small as possible in a driving process; building a parallel computing architecture of a prediction model and the target function, and employing a triggering parallel computing method; solving and computing a gradient with a manner of back propagation and using a gradient descent method to obtain an optimal control amount of the front wheel steering angle and an optimal control amount of the longitudinal acceleration; and computing a driving weight, obtaining a desired front wheel steering angle and completing real time control.