Steering Robot Decoupling for Unbiased Free Response Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic steering controllers for evaluating automatic or driver-assistive steering systems in vehicles introduce undesirable inertia, damping, and friction effects, complicating the measurement of a vehicle's free response and requiring expensive and complex compensation systems.

Innovation Solution

An electromechanical connector system decouples the robotic steering controller from the steering wheel using a servo actuator and compliant coupling, allowing precise control and quick disconnection to minimize the controller's impact on the vehicle's dynamics, enabling accurate evaluation of safety functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional robotic steering control methods are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the vehicle cannot accurately follow the desired path and exhibits oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath following accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering control is divided into multiple independent components: a PID controller for longitudinal error correction, a lateral controller for lateral error correction, and a supervisor controller for coordinating both. This segmentation allows each controller to specialize in specific error corrections, improving path following accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A supervisor controller is introduced as an intermediary between the PID and lateral controllers. This supervisor coordinates the outputs of both controllers, manages their interactions, and prevents conflicts. The intermediary structure enables complex coordinated control without requiring direct complex coupling between all control elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex control algorithms are implemented to improve path following, then tracking accuracy improves, but computational resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath tracking accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm is segmented into simple, dedicated functions: PID controller handles longitudinal errors using basic proportional-integral-derivative calculations, while the lateral controller handles lateral errors separately. This segmentation avoids the need for complex unified algorithms, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining high tracking accuracy through specialized simple controllers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each controller component serves its own specific function independently - the PID controller autonomously corrects longitudinal deviations, the lateral controller autonomously corrects lateral deviations, and the supervisor autonomously coordinates them. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex centralized computation, reducing energy consumption while achieving accurate path following through distributed simple control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If high precision path following is achieved through complex control, then tracking accuracy improves, but the system becomes difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath following precisionVSAvoidsystem implementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into modular components (PID controller, lateral controller, supervisor controller) that can be independently developed, tested, and implemented. Each module has a clear, simple function that is easy to understand and implement, while the overall system achieves high precision through their coordinated operation. This modular segmentation makes the system easier to manufacture and deploy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The supervisor controller acts as an intermediary that simplifies implementation by providing a clear coordination layer between the PID and lateral controllers. It manages the interaction between controllers through well-defined interfaces, making the system easier to implement by avoiding direct complex coupling and providing a structured approach to integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3661825B1Robotic steering controller for optimal free response evaluation
Publication Date: 2022.01.19 DYNAMIC RES INC
  • EP3661825B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3661825B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3661825B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A steering robot for operating a steering wheel of a test automobile is disclosed. The robot includes an actuator mounted to the automobile, and an electromechanical connector that detachably connects the actuator to the steering wheel. A steering processor is connected to the actuator and electromechanical connector, the steering processor (1) actuates the actuator, thereby operating the steering wheel when the actuator is connected to the steering wheel by way of the electromechanical connector; and (2) actuates the electromechanical connector, thereby disconnecting the actuator from the steering wheel.