Steering Wheel Sensor Surface with Mechanical Switches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of vehicle functions to be controlled on a steering wheel poses a challenge due to limited space and the need to prevent unintentional or incorrect operations, while maintaining clarity and minimizing button count.

Innovation Solution

A touch-sensitive, three-dimensionally shaped sensor surface with mechanical switching elements underneath, allowing for individual operation by deforming the surface, and a changeover switch to activate/deactivate these elements, enabling flexible and precise control without additional buttons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple buttons are arranged on the steering wheel to control increasing vehicle functions, then the number of controllable functions increases, but the visual clarity and cleanliness of the steering wheel deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of controllable functionsVSAvoidvisual clarity and cleanliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple buttons into a single touch-sensitive sensor surface that can detect different touch positions, pressures, and patterns to control multiple vehicle functions. This merging approach maintains full functionality while preserving the clean visual appearance of the steering wheel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional complexity to a single button by incorporating multi-dimensional touch detection capabilities including touch position (X, Y coordinates), touch pressure intensity, and touch duration. This allows one button to control multiple functions without adding physical buttons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more buttons are added to the steering wheel to control additional functions, then functional versatility improves, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidnumber of switches and buttons
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The touch-sensitive sensor surface serves as a universal control interface that can detect and respond to multiple different touch inputs (position, pressure, duration, patterns) to control various vehicle functions, replacing what would traditionally require multiple separate buttons or switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in touch parameters (position, pressure intensity, duration, and temporal patterns) to differentiate between multiple control functions, allowing a single sensor surface to replace multiple physical controls through parameter-based differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a flat sensor surface is used, then manufacturing simplicity improves, but tactile feedback and operational precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtactile feedback and precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality changes by creating three-dimensional structures (protrusions or depressions) at specific locations on the sensor surface corresponding to different control functions. These localized structural variations provide tactile feedback while maintaining the overall simplicity of the sensor surface design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If the sensor surface is made more rigid to improve durability, then resistance to damage improves, but flexibility to actuate mechanical switching elements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability and resistance to damageVSAvoidflexibility to actuate switches
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensor surface into different functional zones with distinct mechanical properties. Certain areas are designed with localized flexibility to actuate mechanical switching elements, while other areas maintain higher rigidity for durability and tactile feedback, achieving both requirements through spatial segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies operation of multiple functions, reduces distraction, and maintains a clean, ergonomic design by allowing tactile control without protrusions, while preventing accidental inputs through selective activation/deactivation.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor surface 20 can be a capacitive touch-sensitive sensor surface, for example, so that input can be made simply by touching the sensor surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP2943368B1Control device, vehicle steering wheel and method for operating a control device
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 TRW AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONICS & COMPONENTS GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2943368B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

A control device for a vehicle steering wheel (10) has a closed, touch-sensitive, preferably three-dimensionally shaped sensor surface (20), at least two mechanical switching elements (22), which are arranged under the sensor surface (20) and can be actuated by deforming the sensor surface (20), the touch-sensitive sensor surface (20) being of flexible design such that the mechanical switching elements (22) can be actuated individually, and a selector switch (24), which can activate and/or deactivate the mechanical switching elements (22) and/or the touch-sensitive sensor surface (20).