Steer-by-Wire Steering Wheel Limit Stop for Compact Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 'steer by wire' road vehicle steering systems are complex and costly to manufacture, lacking compactness and efficiency due to the need for extensive mechanical and electrical components to simulate mechanical feedback and limit steering angles.

Innovation Solution

A 'steer by wire' system with a compact and efficient design that uses an electric motor to apply feedback torque to the steering wheel and incorporates a mechanical limit stop device with a spiral groove and pin mechanism to allow over 360° rotation without mechanical connections, reducing component count and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a mechanical connection is used between the steering wheel and control shaft, then mechanical feedback is provided to the driver, but the system complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical feedback to driverVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical connection between steering wheel and control shaft with an electronic system comprising position sensors, electronic control units, and electric actuators. This substitution eliminates complex mechanical linkages while maintaining steering functionality through electronic control, directly resolving the contradiction between mechanical feedback and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If extensive mechanical components are used to simulate mechanical feedback, then driver feedback is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver feedbackVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses electronic sensors and control systems to simulate mechanical feedback instead of using extensive mechanical components. The electric actuator with position sensors provides artificial feedback forces to the steering wheel, achieving driver feedback functionality while significantly reducing manufacturing complexity and cost compared to traditional mechanical feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a mechanical limit stop device is added to the steering wheel, then maximum steering angle is limited, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering angle limitationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical limit stop devices with electronic control mechanisms. The electronic control unit monitors the steering angle through position sensors and controls the electric actuator to prevent excessive steering angles, achieving reliable steering angle limitation without adding mechanical complexity or space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If direct mechanical connection is used between steering wheel and tie rod, then steering control is simple, but the system does not allow for electronic feedback and advanced control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering control simplicityVSAvoidelectronic feedback capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the steering system into independent functional modules: steering wheel with position sensor, electronic control unit, electric actuator, and tie rod. This segmentation allows the steering wheel to be decoupled from the tie rod mechanically while maintaining functional connection through electronic control, enabling both simplicity and electronic feedback capability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a compact, efficient, and cost-effective steering solution with reduced components, enabling a wider axial stroke and improved driver feedback without the need for oversized motors, enhancing steering precision and comfort.

Implementation Method 1

uses an electric motor to apply feedback torque to the steering wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a groove, which is wound in a spiral and has, at the two opposite ends, two abutments, which define respective stop strikers, and a pin, which is arranged inside the groove so as to engage and follow the groove from an abutment up to the opposite abutment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpiral groove mechanism: Helix

Data Source

PatentUS11027768B2Steer by wire road vehicle steering system provided with a mechanical limit stop device for the steering wheel
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 FERRARI SPA
  • US11027768B2 patent drawing
  • US11027768B2 patent drawing
  • US11027768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steering system for a road vehicle; the steering system comprises: a steering wheel provided with an outer ring, which is mounted so as to rotate around a rotation axis and has no connection to steering wheels; a position sensor, which is designed to detect the angular position of the outer ring of the steering wheel around the rotation axis; and a mechanical limit stop device, which is coupled to the outer ring of the steering wheel and limits, in both directions, the maximum angular width of the rotation of the steering wheel around the rotation axis, so that the steering wheel can make, on the whole, a rotation around the rotation axis that is greater than 360°.