Steganographic Modification Detection in Enterprise Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to effectively detect and mitigate malicious steganographic modifications embedded in images, which can compromise enterprise security by remaining undetected and maintaining visual similarity with the original images.

Innovation Solution

A computing platform with a processor, communication interface, and memory generates a safe image by modifying bits from the least significant bit of pixel components, routes it to an isolation zone for execution, and performs security actions based on the results, while also comparing images to identify and replace potentially malicious ones with visually similar safe versions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If steganographic modifications are embedded in images by changing least significant bits, then image fidelity is maintained, but security is compromised due to undetected malicious software

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage fidelityVSAvoidmalicious software detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and mitigation of steganographic modifications before the image is processed or displayed. By analyzing images upfront and removing embedded malicious code, the system prevents security threats while preserving legitimate image content, thus maintaining both security and image fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer between image upload and display that detects and removes steganographic modifications. This intermediary layer analyzes the image data, identifies malicious embeddings, and strips them away while preserving the original image quality, thus resolving the conflict between security and fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If image processing is performed to remove steganographic modifications, then security is improved, but image fidelity may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalicious software removalVSAvoidimage fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing quality to different parts of the image data. It selectively modifies only the specific bits where steganographic modifications are detected (typically least significant bits), while leaving the rest of the image data unchanged. This localized approach removes malicious content while preserving overall image fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes specific parameters of the image data (bit values in color components) to remove steganographic modifications. By selectively altering only the necessary bits that contain malicious information and leaving other parameters unchanged, the system maintains image quality while achieving security mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive security scanning is performed on all images, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteganographic modification detectionVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial scanning by focusing detection efforts on specific areas or characteristics of images where steganographic modifications are most likely to be embedded. Rather than exhaustively analyzing every pixel and bit uniformly, the system targets probable locations, achieving high detection accuracy with reduced processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements optimized scanning that skips through image data efficiently, using heuristics and patterns to quickly identify potential steganographic modifications. By rushing through the analysis process with intelligent shortcuts, the system maintains high detection precision while minimizing processing time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20250013749A1Steganographic modification detection and mitigation for enhanced enterprise security
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250013749A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013749A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013749A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to mitigation and detection of steganographic modifications embedded in images. A computing platform may receive an image embedded with steganographic modifications. The computing platform may change or modify any number of bits of one or more color components of one or more pixels of an image, rendering the steganographic modifications ineffective. The computing platform may cause at an isolation zone system, execution of an image, including steganographic modifications, to identify images embedded with steganographic modifications. The computing platform may also compare an image with image stored in an image storage module. The computing platform may store an image from the image storage module with a highest visual comparison score rather than the image.