Stem Cell Differentiation Device Using Automated Feature Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining stem cell differentiation are inefficient, as they require manual observation of time-series images to identify changes from undifferentiated to differentiated states, are time-consuming, and rely heavily on the skill level of the culturist, leading to non-uniformity and inaccurate results.

Innovation Solution

A stem cell differentiation determination device and method that captures time-series images, acquires feature amounts, and determines differentiation status, providing change information on feature amounts or determination results, including timing and positional data, to facilitate accurate and efficient assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual observation of time-series images is used to determine stem cell differentiation, then the determination can be performed with simple equipment, but the process is inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferentiation determination efficiencyVSAvoidtime required to check observation images
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with automated image processing algorithms that analyze observation images to detect stem cell differentiation. The system automatically extracts feature amounts from images and compares them against reference data to determine differentiation status, eliminating the need for culturists to manually examine time-series images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service differentiation determination by automatically processing images and generating determination results without requiring expert culturist intervention. The automated analysis includes extracting feature amounts, comparing with reference data, and outputting differentiation status, allowing the system to serve itself in the differentiation assessment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If culturists check all observation images to identify differentiation changes, then accurate determination can be achieved, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferentiation determination accuracyVSAvoidtime to check all colonies
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential feature amounts from observation images that are relevant to differentiation determination, rather than requiring analysis of entire images. By identifying and extracting specific features such as colony morphology, size, and optical characteristics, the system achieves accurate differentiation determination while significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms visual image data into quantifiable parameter changes by measuring feature amounts such as colony area, circularity, and optical density. These parameter changes are then compared against reference data to objectively determine differentiation status, maintaining accuracy while enabling automated high-speed analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If determination relies on culturist skill level, then flexible judgment can be made, but non-uniformity occurs in results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation flexibilityVSAvoidresult consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts subjective visual assessment into objective parameter measurements by extracting quantifiable feature amounts from images. These parameters such as colony area, shape factors, and optical properties provide consistent, reproducible measurements that eliminate variability between different culturists while maintaining the ability to detect differentiation changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where determination results are compared against reference data from known undifferentiated and differentiated states. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn and adapt to different cell types and culture conditions while maintaining consistent, reproducible determination criteria across different operators and time points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10114003B2Stem cell differentiation determination device, method, and program
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US10114003B2 patent drawing
  • US10114003B2 patent drawing
  • US10114003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stem cell differentiation determination device includes an observation image acquisition unit that captures an image of an observation region including a stem cell in time series to acquire at least two observation images, a feature amount acquisition unit that acquires at least one feature amount of the stem cell for each observation image, a determination unit that determines whether or not the stem cell has been differentiated, on the basis of the feature amount, a change information acquisition unit that acquires information about a change in the feature amount between the observation images captured in time series or information about a change in a determination result from undifferentiation to differentiation between the observation images, and an output unit that outputs the information about a change in the feature amount or the information about a change in the determination result.