STEM Deflection Segmentation for PED Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing scanning transmission electron microscopes (STEMs) face challenges in accurately recording precession electron diffraction patterns due to the need for different deflection strengths and frequencies for beam shift and tilt, leading to difficulties in maintaining dynamic range and frequency response in single deflector circuits, and suboptimal deflector positions.

Innovation Solution

The STEM is configured with separate scanning and precession deflection systems, each with independent signal generators, positioned between the electron beam source and the sample, allowing for independent control of beam shift and tilt, and featuring magnetic or electrostatic deflectors to enhance deflection strength and precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single deflection system is used for both beam shift and tilt, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and dynamic range deteriorate due to conflicting deflection strength requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection system complexityVSAvoiddiffraction pattern precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The deflection system is segmented into separate scanning deflection means and precession deflection means, allowing independent optimization of each subsystem for its specific function while avoiding the conflicts that would arise in a unified system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A beam shift register is introduced as an intermediary component between the scanning and precession deflection systems, serving as a buffer that decouples their different deflection strength requirements and frequency response needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If beam tilt deflection strength is increased to achieve proper tilt, then beam shift precision deteriorates due to excessive deflection strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam tilt deflection strengthVSAvoidbeam shift precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The deflection system is divided into separate scanning deflection means for beam shift and precession deflection means for beam tilt, allowing each subsystem to be optimized for its specific deflection strength requirements without interfering with the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the deflection system are designed with locally optimized properties: the scanning deflection means is designed for precise, low-strength beam shift operations, while the precession deflection means is designed for higher-strength beam tilt operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If scanning and precession deflection are combined in a single system, then device simplicity is improved, but frequency response deteriorates due to different characteristic frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection system structureVSAvoidfrequency response
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The deflection system is segmented into separate scanning and precession subsystems, each with its own signal generator optimized for its characteristic frequency, allowing independent frequency optimization without compromise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different deflection modes: the scanning deflection operates at scanning frequencies while the precession deflection operates at precession frequencies, with each subsystem activated according to its optimal frequency range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables the recording of high-quality precession electron diffraction patterns with improved dynamic range and frequency response, allowing for more accurate analysis of atomic structures and spatial variations in materials.

Implementation Method 1

The electrons which pass through the specimen (the transmitted electrons) are scattered in an angular distribution, which is dependent on the atomic structure of the specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

The measured angular distribution of the transmitted electrons is referred to as the electron diffraction (ED) pattern, because the shape of the pattern is the result of interference of the electrons scattered from different atoms in the specimen in a process known as diffraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 3

The deflectors can be either electromagnetic or electrostatic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic deflection: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 4

The deflectors can be either electromagnetic or electrostatic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deflection: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS10636622B2Scanning transmission electron microscope
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 TESCAN TEMPE LLC
  • US10636622B2 patent drawing
  • US10636622B2 patent drawing
  • US10636622B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A scanning transmission electron microscope is adapted to acquire high quality precession electron diffraction (PED) patterns by means of separated scanning deflectors and precession deflectors. Magnetic or electrostatic deflectors may be used for scanning and for precession. This enables independent optimization of parameters for each deflection system to achieve a broad operating range simultaneously for both deflection systems.