STEM Dose Control for Low-Damage Charged Particle Microscopy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing scanning charged particle microscopes cause beam-induced damage to beam-sensitive samples, particularly at low acceleration voltages, and require expert user intervention for optimizing imaging conditions, which are not easily reproducible.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that uses a controller to determine parameter settings for the illuminator and scanning unit based on a desired dose, employing numerical models, active measurements, or calibration data to minimize beam-induced damage, enabling reproducible experiments even for non-expert users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If low acceleration voltage is used to reduce knock-on damage, then beam-induced damage is minimized, but imaging conditions become difficult to control and reproduce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam-induced damageVSAvoidimaging condition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts multiple imaging parameters (acceleration voltage, probe current, dwell time, scan rate) based on numerical models and real-time measurements, transforming manual parameter optimization into an automated process that maintains optimal conditions while minimizing beam damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops using active measurements of beam current and sample response to dynamically adjust imaging parameters, ensuring reproducible conditions and preventing beam-induced damage through real-time monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If expert users manually optimize imaging conditions, then beam-induced damage is reduced, but the process requires expert intervention and is not reproducible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam-induced damageVSAvoidautomated imaging control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-optimization of imaging conditions by automatically adjusting parameters based on numerical models and real-time measurements, eliminating the need for expert user intervention while maintaining optimal imaging quality and minimizing beam damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates optimal imaging parameters using numerical models before actual imaging, and prepares the microscope settings in advance, allowing non-expert users to achieve reproducible results without manual optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If acceleration voltage is changed to reduce damage, then knock-on damage decreases, but hours of drift occur and extensive retuning is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknock-on damageVSAvoiddrift and retuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts acceleration voltage and other parameters during imaging based on real-time measurements and numerical models, allowing continuous optimization without manual intervention or lengthy retuning periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically coordinates changes in multiple parameters (voltage, probe current, dwell time) to compensate for drift effects, maintaining stable imaging conditions without requiring manual retuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows non-experts to achieve reproducible, low-dose scanning transmission microscopy with minimized beam-induced damage, facilitating consistent results across different microscopes and locations.

Implementation Method 1

The interaction may lead to elastically scattered electrons exiting the sample, which may be detected to form a microscopic image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

irradiation of the sample precipitates emanation of 'auxiliary' radiation from the sample, in the form of secondary electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

backscattered electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackscattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 4

X-rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray emission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 5

cathodoluminescence (infrared, visible and/or ultraviolet photons)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCathodoluminescence: Cathodoluminescence

Implementation Method 6

These high energy electrons limit the range of materials that can be studied with high resolution and without damage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKnock-on damage: Impact Force

Implementation Method 7

other damage mechanisms can increase at these lower acceleration voltages, for example ionization damage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization damage: Ionisation

Data Source

PatentUS12463009B2Method and system for studying samples using a scanning transmission charged particle microscope with reduced beam induced sample damage
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 FEI CO
  • US12463009B2 patent drawing
  • US12463009B2 patent drawing
  • US12463009B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method for examining a sample in a scanning transmission charged particle microscope. The method comprises the steps of providing a scanning transmission charged particle microscope, having an illuminator and a scanning unit. The method comprises the steps of providing a desired dose for at least a first sample location of the plurality of sample locations; and determining, using a controller of the microscope, a first set of parameter settings for the illuminator and the scanning unit for substantially achieving the desired dose at the first sample location.