Stemless Humerus Implant Locking Member for Secure Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems lack precision and accuracy in preparing bones for shoulder arthroplasty, particularly for stemless implants, which require secure placement in the humerus without a stem.

Innovation Solution

A robotic surgery system with a robotic manipulator and cutting tool, guided by a localizer and controller, forms cavities in the humerus to receive a shoulder implant, featuring an undercut for a locking member to prevent implant withdrawal, using virtual objects for precise bone preparation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If a stemless implant is used to spare bone material, then bone removal is reduced and patient benefit increases, but implant stability and security decrease due to lack of stem engagement in humeral canal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone material removalVSAvoidimplant stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into separate functional components: a proximal body for articulation and a distal body with locking members for fixation. The locking members are further segmented into multiple discrete elements that can engage with the bone at different locations, providing distributed stability without requiring a traditional stem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking members are positioned within cavities formed in the humerus, with the distal body nesting within the bone structure. The locking members can be inserted through the distal body and engage with the bone from the interior, creating a nested configuration that secures the implant without extensive bone removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Extent of automation

If existing robotic systems are used for shoulder arthroplasty, then automated bone preparation is provided, but accuracy and precision are insufficient for stemless implant placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated bone preparationVSAvoidcavity formation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs preliminary actions by forming cavities with precise dimensions and orientations before implant insertion. The system pre-defines the exact location, size, and shape of cavities for the distal body and locking members, ensuring that when the implant is inserted, it achieves optimal fit and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the bone preparation process in real-time, adjusting cutting parameters and cavity formation based on actual bone density and geometry measurements, thereby achieving high precision for the complex multi-cavity structure required by stemless implants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent implant withdrawal, then implant security improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant fixation securityVSAvoidimplant structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking members are designed to engage with the bone and distal body through self-service mechanisms, where the implant structure itself provides the locking action without requiring separate external locking devices. The distal body incorporates integrated locking members that automatically engage with prepared cavities in the bone, providing secure fixation as part of the implant's own structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking function is merged with the distal body structure, combining the fixation element and the locking mechanism into a single integrated component. This reduces overall device complexity by eliminating separate locking devices while maintaining secure implant fixation through the combined structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4144322B1Implant component for a humerus
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
  • EP4144322B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4144322B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4144322B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An implant component (102) for a humerus (H) formed with an undercut portion (132) comprises a proximal body (114) having a semi-spherical head (116), and a distal body (120) configured to be secured to the proximal body (114). The distal body (120) comprises a locking member (126) extending radially outwardly from the distal body (120). The locking member (126) is rotatable about an implant axis (IA) from an unlocked position to a locked position whereby the locking member (126) is configured to engage the undercut portion (132) for limiting withdrawal of the implant component (102) from the humerus (H).