Stencil Mask Deposition via Temperature Differential

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current thin film deposition techniques using stencil masks face issues with blurring due to geometrical factors and diffusion, clogging of nano-stencils, and membrane stability, particularly during chemical vapor deposition of oxides, which limits the re-usability and effectiveness of the masks.

Innovation Solution

The use of a vacuum Chemical Vapour Deposition technique with a stencil mask and multiple geometrically distributed precursor sources allows for selective deposition on the substrate, avoiding deposition on the mask and enabling complex 3D thin film structures with high resolution, while maintaining a controlled temperature difference between the substrate and mask to prevent clogging and extend mask life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If stencil mask is used for direct patterned deposition, then single step fabrication is achieved, but blurring occurs due to gap between mask and substrate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle step fabricationVSAvoidpattern resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state and temperature parameters of the substrate and mask. The substrate is heated to decompose precursor molecules and promote deposition, while the mask is kept cool to prevent deposition on its surface. This temperature differential resolves the contradiction by enabling precise patterning through controlled chemical reactions rather than relying solely on physical proximity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transitions of precursor molecules from gas phase to solid film phase through thermal decomposition on the heated substrate. This phase change occurs selectively on the substrate surface due to temperature control, preventing material deposition on the mask while achieving precise pattern transfer through the mask apertures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Manufacturing precision

If stencil mask is used for deposition, then pattern replication is achieved, but clogging occurs due to material deposition on side walls of apertures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern replicationVSAvoidmask re-usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies temperature parameter control to prevent clogging. By maintaining the mask at a lower temperature than the substrate, the mask surface conditions are optimized to repel or prevent deposition of deposited material. This temperature differential ensures that material flows through the apertures to the substrate without accumulating on the mask side walls, preserving aperture dimensions and enabling mask re-usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of precursor decomposition into a beneficial selective deposition process. By controlling temperature distribution, the decomposition occurs preferentially on the heated substrate rather than on the cooler mask, transforming what could be mask-clogging material into useful deposited film on the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If stencil mask is used for deposition, then direct patterning is achieved, but membrane stability is compromised due to stress from material deposition and thermal effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect patterningVSAvoidmembrane stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies thermal parameter control to protect membrane stability. By maintaining the mask at a lower temperature, thermal stress on the membrane is reduced. Additionally, preventing material deposition on the mask eliminates mechanical stress from accumulated material. This temperature control strategy allows the use of thin, flexible stencil masks that would otherwise be compromised by thermal and mechanical stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the thermal energy that would normally stress the membrane into a selective deposition control mechanism. The temperature gradient between mask and substrate transforms potential harmful thermal effects into a beneficial control parameter that directs decomposition and deposition away from the mask, preserving membrane integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high-resolution, multifunctional thin film deposition with improved mask re-usability and longer lifespan, enabling cost-effective mass production of coatings with unique properties and enhanced anti-counterfeiting and traceability features.

Implementation Method 1

molecules of the chemical precursor pass through the one or more mask openings to impinge onto the substrate surface for deposition thereon. At least a part of the chemical precursor molecules decompose on the substrate surface at a decomposition temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

heating the substrate surface using a heating device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

vacuum Chemical Vapour Deposition technique, namely Chemical Beam Vapour Deposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP3119683B1Deposition process based on stencil mask and application to the fabrication of tags supporting multi-functional traceable codes
Publication Date: 2021.10.06 3D OXIDES
  • EP3119683B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP3119683B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3119683B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d

AI summary

A chemical gas phase deposition process comprises steps of providing a high vacuum chamber, and inside the high vacuum chamber: positioning a substrate surface; positioning a mask parallel to the substrate surface, whereby the mask comprises one or more openings; adjusting a gap of determined dimension between the substrate surface and the mask; and orienting a plurality of chemical precursor beams of at least one precursor species towards the mask with line of sight propagation, each of the plurality of chemical precursor beams being emitted from an independent punctual source, and molecules of the chemical precursor pass through the one or more mask openings to impinge onto the substrate surface for deposition thereon. At least a part of the chemical precursor molecules decompose on the substrate surface at a decomposition temperature. The process further comprises adjusting a temperature of the substrate surface greater or equal to the chemical precursor molecule decomposition temperature, thereby remaining greater than a mask temperature, and maintaining the mask temperature below the decomposition temperature, thereby causing a decomposition of the chemical precursor and a growth of a film on the substrate surface, but not on the mask; and heating the substrate surface using a heating device.