Stencil Pattern Run Out Correction in Directional Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pattern run out in directional deposition or etching occurs due to stencil shadowing, limiting the accuracy of pattern deposition or etching on substrates away from the normal to the directional source.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a test substrate with a known stencil thickness, measuring pattern run out as a function of position, adjusting magnification and translational offset for a further substrate, and applying these corrections to ensure accurate deposition or etching of the desired pattern.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a stencil of finite thickness is used in directional deposition or etching, then the stencil provides structural support and pattern definition, but pattern run out occurs causing displacement of the deposited pattern from the stencil pattern

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidstencil thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention pre-calculates and applies correction factors to the stencil pattern design before fabrication. By determining the pattern run out displacement as a function of position and stencil thickness, and incorporating these corrections into the stencil pattern, the system compensates for the inevitable shadowing effect that occurs during directional deposition or etching

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameters of the stencil pattern (position, shape, dimensions) based on calculated correction factors that account for stencil thickness and deposition geometry. These parameter modifications ensure that the final deposited pattern matches the desired pattern despite the shadowing effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If the substrate is positioned away from the normal to the directional source, then larger substrate area can be processed, but pattern run out increases reducing pattern accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate areaVSAvoidpattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies different correction factors to different regions of the stencil pattern based on their position relative to the substrate center. Each local region of the pattern is corrected according to its specific displacement requirements, allowing the entire substrate area to be processed with uniform pattern accuracy despite varying distances from the normal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If stencil thickness is increased to improve structural stability, then stencil shadowing increases causing greater pattern displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestencil stabilityVSAvoidpattern registration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention incorporates stencil thickness as a key parameter in the correction factor calculations. By measuring or specifying the actual stencil thickness and using it to determine the appropriate correction factors, the system compensates for the shadowing effect caused by thicker stencils, maintaining pattern registration accuracy regardless of stencil structural requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method corrects for pattern run out, allowing for precise deposition or etching of patterns on substrates even remote from the directional source, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the process.

Implementation Method 1

The thickness of the stencil results in stencil shadowing with the pattern on the substrate being slightly displaced from the corresponding portion of the pattern of the stencil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShadowing: Shadow

Data Source

PatentUS7862859B2Method of correcting for pattern run out
Publication Date: 2011.01.04 QORVO US INC
  • US7862859B2 patent drawing
  • US7862859B2 patent drawing
  • US7862859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of correcting for pattern run out in a desired pattern in directional deposition or etching comprising the steps ofproviding a test substrate;providing a stencil of known thickness on the test substrate;providing a stencil pattern extending through the stencil to the test substrate.exposing the test substrate through the stencil to a source of directional deposition or etching;comparing the stencil pattern to the pattern on the substrate at a plurality of points along at least one direction to determine pattern run out at said points;fitting the measured pattern run out as a function of position to a function of the formΔX=MX+C where ΔX=pattern run out, X=position on the substrate, M=Magnification and C=translational offset;providing a further substrate at a known position relative to the first;providing a further stencil of known thickness;adjusting the magnification to allow for the difference in stencil thickness between the test stencil and the further stencil;adjusting the transitional offset to allow for the difference in position of the test substrate and further substrate along said direction;providing a desired pattern to be deposited or etched on the further substrate;correcting each point of the desired pattern by the inverse of the determined pattern run out at the point;providing the corrected desired pattern on this further stencil, the pattern extending through the further stencil to the substrate;exposing the further substrate through the further stencil to the directional source of deposition or etching.