Endoluminal Stent Sinusoidal Ringlets Offset Connectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional endoluminal stents face challenges in achieving a balance among functional attributes such as radial crush resistance, flexibility, and foreshortening, often compromising on one attribute for another, and may exhibit low resistance to axial compressive forces, leading to axial distortion and risk of fatigue fracture.

Innovation Solution

The endoluminal stent features sinusoidal-shaped expandable ringlets connected by non-linear, asymmetrical offset connectors, providing uniform stress distribution, high flexibility, and resistance to longitudinal compression, while minimizing stress concentration and twisting of ringlets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional mesh or non-mesh stent designs are used, then radial crush resistance is improved, but longitudinal compression resistance deteriorates leading to axial distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradial crush resistanceVSAvoidaxial stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The stent is segmented into multiple interconnected undulating rings with intermediate struts, creating a modular structure that distributes axial compressive forces across multiple elements rather than concentrating them in a single continuous mesh pattern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The undulating rings feature curved, sinusoidal geometries that provide inherent resistance to longitudinal compression while maintaining radial strength, eliminating the need to compromise axial stability for radial support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of operation

If stent flexibility is improved for better deliverability, then ease of operation is improved, but longitudinal compression resistance deteriorates causing foreshortening

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedeliverabilityVSAvoidlongitudinal compression resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The stent structure incorporates dynamic undulating ring configurations that allow controlled deformation during delivery while maintaining structural integrity under compression, enabling the stent to adapt its shape without permanent foreshortening

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The stent design changes the geometric parameters of the ring structures and their interconnections to optimize the balance between flexibility for delivery and resistance to compression-induced foreshortening during expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If radial recoil after expansion is improved for lumen patency, then strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradial recoilVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The functions of radial support, longitudinal stability, and controlled expansion are merged into the integrated undulating ring structure with intermediate struts, achieving multiple performance goals without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3242641B1Endoluminal stent
Publication Date: 2021.06.30 SAHAJANAND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
  • EP3242641B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3242641B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3242641B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An endoluminal stent (100) is described herein. In an embodiment, the endoluminal stent (100) includes a plurality of sinusoidal-shaped expandable ringlets (102) provided in parallel to form a tubular structure of the endoluminal stent (100). Further, adjacent ringlets (102) can be connected to each other by one or more asymmetrical offset connectors (108), the offset connectors (108) being non-linear in structure.