Step Drill Bit Geometry for Impact-Driver Edge Chipping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Step drill bits used with impact drivers are prone to chipping due to the cutting edge being more susceptible to wear and damage, especially when drilling through thin-walled workpieces.

Innovation Solution

A step drill bit design featuring axially stacked, progressively sized steps with varying helix and rake angles, where the helix angle at the terminal step increases by at least 70% and the rake angle by at least 40% relative to the first step, along with a protective coating like titanium aluminum nitride, to enhance durability and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a step drill bit is used with an impact driver, then drilling speed and efficiency are improved, but the cutting edge becomes more prone to chipping and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling speedVSAvoidcutting edge durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different helix angles and rake angles to cutting edges at different steps of the drill bit. Specifically, smaller steps have smaller helix angles and rake angles while larger steps have larger helix angles and rake angles. This local differentiation optimizes each cutting edge for its specific step size, improving both cutting performance and resistance to chipping when used with impact drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters (helix angle and rake angle) of the cutting edges based on the step size. By systematically varying these parameters across different steps, the drill bit achieves optimal balance between drilling efficiency and cutting edge protection, directly addressing the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the helix angle and rake angle are increased at the terminal step, then cutting performance and hole quality are improved, but the complexity of the drill bit design increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole qualityVSAvoiddrill bit design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drill bit is segmented into multiple steps, with each step having its own optimized cutting edge geometry. This segmentation allows the patent to apply different helix and rake angles to different steps, improving hole quality for various drill sizes while maintaining a systematic design approach that manages complexity through repetition of the step pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11273501B2Step drill bit
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US11273501B2 patent drawing
  • US11273501B2 patent drawing
  • US11273501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drill bit includes a shank extending along a bit axis and a body with a proximal end adjacent the shank and a distal end opposite the proximal end. The body defines a plurality of axially stacked, progressively sized steps including a first step at the distal end and a terminal step at the proximal end. The drill bit also includes a flute in the body. The flute defines an elongated groove that extends from the distal end to the proximal end. The drill bit further includes a plurality of cutting edges formed in the body. Each cutting edge is disposed along one of the plurality of steps and defines a helix angle and a rake angle. The helix angle of the cutting edge at the terminal step is greater than the helix angle of the cutting edge at the first step. A ratio of the helix angle to the rake angle of the cutting edge at the first step is in a range from 0.5 to 2.4, and a ratio of the helix angle to the rake angle of the cutting edge at the terminal step is in a range of 0.9 to 1.7.