Stepped-Impedance Resonator for Compact High-Q Filters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cavity resonators used in filters, particularly in telecommunications, face challenges in reducing size while maintaining high quality factor and electrical performance, as they are typically large due to the quarter wavelength constraint, and existing miniaturization methods either compromise Q-factor or are difficult to fabricate accurately.

Innovation Solution

A resonator assembly with a resonant member having a main portion and a cap portion with a progressively increasing cross-sectional area, reducing impedance mismatch and power loss, allowing for a smaller size without significantly reducing the quality factor, achieved through a flared shape and tapered sections that increase capacitance and reduce frequency of operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cavity resonators are used to achieve high quality factor, then the Q factor is improved, but the size of the resonator increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality factorVSAvoidresonator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the geometric parameters of the resonator structure. Specifically, it uses a stepped-impedance design where the resonator cross-section changes along its length, creating regions of different impedance. This geometric parameter modification allows the resonator to achieve the required electrical length for high Q-factor while physically occupying less space, thereby resolving the contradiction between quality factor and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dimensionality change by transitioning from a uniform cross-section resonator to a stepped-impedance structure with varying cross-sectional areas. This introduces a dimensional variation along the resonator length, creating capacitive and inductive regions that effectively increase the electrical path length without proportionally increasing the physical volume, thus achieving high Q-factor in a compact form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the size of cavity resonator is reduced, then the volume is improved, but the quality factor deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonator sizeVSAvoidquality factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by carefully controlling the dimensions and positions of the stepped sections in the resonator. By adjusting the cross-sectional areas, lengths of different sections, and their positions, the design optimizes the impedance distribution to maintain high Q-factor despite the reduced overall volume. The specific parameter values are chosen to achieve resonance at the desired frequency with minimal energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dimensionality change by creating a non-uniform resonator structure with varying cross-sections along its length. This dimensional variation introduces capacitive loading at the expanded sections and inductive effects in the constricted sections, effectively increasing the electrical length within a compact physical footprint, thereby maintaining high Q-factor in a reduced volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Length of moving object

If high order filters are deployed to achieve small guard band, then the frequency separation is improved, but the cost and space increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency separationVSAvoidfilter order
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the resonator's geometric parameters to achieve higher Q-factor. Since the required filter order is inversely related to Q-factor, the improved resonator performance allows for lower order filters to achieve the same frequency separation and guard band specifications, thereby reducing the number of resonator elements needed and simplifying the overall filter structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dimensionality change in the resonator structure to achieve superior Q-factor performance. This enhanced resonator efficiency means that fewer resonator stages are required to achieve the desired filter selectivity and frequency separation, reducing the filter order and consequently decreasing both the physical space and complexity of the filter assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Volume of moving object

If capacitive caps are used to reduce resonator size, then the volume is improved, but the Q factor reduces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonator sizeVSAvoidQ factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by implementing a stepped-impedance design with specifically optimized cross-sectional dimensions at each section. Rather than using simple capacitive caps that create abrupt impedance discontinuities, the gradual stepping of impedance values minimizes reflective losses and maintains high Q-factor while achieving size reduction through the optimized geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dimensionality change through a controlled variation of the resonator cross-section along its length. This gradual dimensional transition creates a distributed impedance profile that provides capacitive loading for size reduction while maintaining smooth field transitions that minimize energy loss, thereby preserving high Q-factor unlike abrupt capacitive caps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design results in a resonator assembly that is significantly smaller than conventional cavity filters while maintaining high quality factor and performance, with reduced power loss and impedance mismatch, making it suitable for high-frequency applications like base stations.

Implementation Method 1

a cap portion of said resonant member extending from said main portion towards said opposing second inner surface and having a progressively increasing cross sectional area increasing from said first cross sectional area adjacent to said main portion to a larger cap cross sectional area at an end of said resonant member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

A resonator assembly comprises a resonant member within a conductive resonator cavity; said resonant member extending from a first inner surface of said resonator cavity towards an opposing second inner surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10056665B2Resonator assembly and filter
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 ALCATEL LUCENT SA
  • US10056665B2 patent drawing
  • US10056665B2 patent drawing
  • US10056665B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A resonator assembly comprising a resonant member within a conductive resonator cavity is disclosed. The resonant member extends from a first inner surface of the resonator cavity towards an opposing second inner surface. A main portion of the resonant member has a substantially constant first cross sectional area. A cap portion of the resonant member extending from the main portion towards the opposing second inner surface has a progressively increasing cross sectional area increasing from the first cross sectional area adjacent to the main portion to a larger cap cross sectional area at an end of the resonant member, the larger cap cross sectional area being at least 1.i times as large as the first cross sectional area. The resonant member may also have a flared section at the other end giving the resonant member an hour glass type shape.