Stepped Spiral Chute With Variable Friction Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spiral packaging chutes often experience issues with packages getting stuck due to insufficient surface friction, and attempts to reduce friction with wheels or skate assemblies result in packages moving too fast, requiring additional safety measures like nets at the destination.

Innovation Solution

A stepped spiral chute design featuring a plurality of angular segments with a downwardly sloping surface, supported by rods or a tower assembly, and equipped with a decreasing number of low-friction plastic panels along the outer surface to control the speed of moving articles, preventing sticking and excessive speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the chute surface friction is reduced to prevent packages from getting stuck, then the packages move smoothly without sticking, but the packages move too fast requiring additional safety measures like nets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of packages getting stuckVSAvoidpackage velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The chute surface is divided into zones with different friction characteristics. The upper portion has higher friction to accelerate packages and prevent sticking, while the lower portion has lower friction to maintain smooth movement. This spatial variation in surface properties allows simultaneous control of both sticking prevention and speed management without requiring additional safety nets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If wheels or skate assemblies are used to reduce friction, then the packages move faster through the chute, but the packages must be slowed and caught with a net at the destination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage throughput speedVSAvoidneed for additional slowing devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chute surface itself provides the friction control function that would otherwise require separate wheels, skates, or braking devices. By engineering the surface friction properties directly into the chute structure, the system achieves speed control inherently without needing additional active components for acceleration or deceleration, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If the chute has a smooth surface to reduce resistance, then the friction is low for movement, but the surface friction is not high enough to provide continual motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage movement speedVSAvoidcontinual motion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The chute surface is engineered with spatially varying friction properties where the upper section has higher friction coefficients to ensure packages gain momentum and continue moving, while the lower section has lower friction to reduce resistance. This local differentiation of surface properties simultaneously achieves both continual motion and efficient speed through the chute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The chute system effectively conveys articles at a controlled velocity, reducing the risk of sticking and allowing for safe handling by maintaining tangential contact with the chute surface, thus eliminating the need for additional slowing devices like nets.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of plastic panels are uniquely positioned along the outer surface of the angular chute segments... the number of plastic panels positioned on each angular chute segment is dependent on the height of the angular chute segment... such that the number plastic panels per chute segment decreases in area as the chute segment descends

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The packages move utilizing gravity from one point to the next

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9415936B1Stepped spiral chute assembly having friction reduction panels and method of forming same
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 ALTERNATIVE ENG
  • US9415936B1 patent drawing
  • US9415936B1 patent drawing
  • US9415936B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A helical chute system for conveying articles from an upper elevation to a lower elevation within a building includes a chute wound about a vertical axis and being secured at both an inner edge and outer edge by one or more support rods where a portion of the chute is comprised of a plurality of angular chute segments secured together in a stepped relationship to one another where each chute segment has a first surface sloping downwardly to a second surface below the first surface. An inner skirt is attached to the inner surface of the chute for preventing articles from falling from the surface of the chute and an outer skirt is attached to the outer surface of the chute for preventing articles from falling from the surface of the chute. One or more of plastic panels are positioned along the outer surface of the angular chute segments abutting the outer skirt. The number of low friction panels positioned on each angular chute segment is dependent on the height of the angular chute segment in the helical chute system such that the number panels per chute segment decreases in area as the chute segment descends about the vertical axis.