Stepper Motor Stator Pole Spacing for Higher Torque and Lower Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hybrid stepper motors suffer from poor magnetic flux utilization due to mismatched stator and rotor pole separations, leading to low torque and high noise, which is inadequate for high-speed, low-resolution applications.

Innovation Solution

A 2-phase bipolar step motor design with four groups of stator poles, where each group consists of stator poles of alternating polarities, with angular separations based on the rotor tooth pitch times 0.5 or 0.75, creating short magnetic flux paths and optimizing winding patterns for improved torque and reduced noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional hybrid stepper motors use standard stator pole configurations (e.g., 4 poles with 90° separation), then the motor structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but magnetic flux utilization is poor leading to low torque and high noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestator pole configuration simplicityVSAvoidtorque output
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The stator is divided into multiple pole groups (e.g., 8 pole groups with 45° separation) instead of using conventional 4 poles. Each pole group contains multiple teeth (e.g., 5 teeth per pole), creating a segmented structure that improves magnetic flux distribution and utilization while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the stator are given different properties through the pole group configuration. Each pole group is positioned at specific angular intervals (e.g., 45° separation) with optimized tooth arrangements, creating local magnetic field characteristics that maximize flux utilization and torque production in critical regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the stepping angle is reduced to increase resolution (e.g., 1.8° stepper with 200 steps per revolution), then directional resolution is improved, but motor speed decreases and holding torque is reduced for the same physical size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional resolutionVSAvoidmotor speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The motor achieves both high resolution and high speed by changing key parameters: using a larger number of pole groups (e.g., 8 groups instead of 4) with smaller angular separation (45° instead of 90°), and configuring multiple teeth per pole (e.g., 5 teeth). This creates a 0.9° stepping angle that provides fine resolution while the optimized flux paths and pole configuration maintain high-speed performance and torque

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If the number of stator poles is increased to improve torque (e.g., 8 poles instead of 4), then holding torque increases, but the angular separation between poles decreases leading to longer flux paths and reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding torqueVSAvoidmagnetic flux utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The 8 stator poles are organized into 8 pole groups with each group containing multiple teeth (e.g., 5 teeth per pole). This segmentation allows the magnetic flux to take shorter, more direct paths through the rotor, improving flux utilization efficiency while maintaining the 8-pole configuration needed for high holding torque

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a dimensional aspect by organizing poles into groups with multiple teeth arranged in specific patterns. This creates a two-level structure (pole groups containing individual teeth) that optimizes flux paths in both the angular dimension and the radial dimension, reducing flux path length and improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances magnetic flux utilization, resulting in increased torque and reduced noise, enabling higher speed and lower resolution operations while maintaining adequate holding torque.

Implementation Method 1

A rotor has a set of permanent magnets of alternating N and S magnetic polarity around its circumference that interact with the stator poles across a small cylindrical gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

Electromagnetic coils and 14 wind around the stator poles 11, forming phase-A coils 13 and phase-B coils 14

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11742736B2Step motor with spacing of same-phase stator pole groups based on one-half rotor tooth pitch
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 LIN ENGINEERING INC
  • US11742736B2 patent drawing
  • US11742736B2 patent drawing
  • US11742736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A 2-phase bipolar step motor has a rotor and a stator, the rotor having a plurality of equally spaced rotor poles of alternating north and south magnetic polarities, and the stator having at least eight stator poles extending radially from a stator yoke and terminating in pole shoes interacting radially across an air gap with the rotor poles to cause the rotor to rotate step-by-step when windings around the stator poles are driven by a succession of energized states of the stator. The stator poles divided into four equal groups having a specified drive phase A or B, adjacent poles of a group having alternating drive polarities of the same drive phase A and Ā, or B and B. Adjacent poles in the same group are separated by a center-to-center angle one-half of the rotor tooth pitch or up to 20% larger. Adjacent poles of different groups have a larger separation than that between poles of the same group.