Stereo Depth Hazard Detection for Small Distant Road Obstacles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hazard detection systems for autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles are inadequate due to reliance on extensive training data, inaccurate assumptions, high costs, and limited detection capabilities, particularly for small hazards at a distance.

Innovation Solution

A multi-view geometry-based system using synchronized stereo cameras to generate depth maps and identify discontinuities in disparity values, cropping images to focus on the driving surface, and applying a disparity threshold to detect hazards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deep neural network approaches are used for hazard detection, then detection capability is improved, but training data requirements and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection capabilityVSAvoidtraining data requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the need for extensive training data by using multi-view geometry and disparity analysis. Instead of relying on DNN training, the system directly computes depth discontinuities from stereo camera pairs, eliminating the training data burden while maintaining hazard detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the computational mechanics of DNN training with geometric mechanics of stereo vision. By substituting the learning-based approach with direct geometric computation of disparity maps, the system achieves hazard detection without requiring large training datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If single camera planar-parallax-based approaches are used, then system cost is reduced, but detection accuracy deteriorates due to inaccurate assumptions about roadway geometry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidhazard detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scene into distinct depth layers by analyzing disparity discontinuities in the depth map. This segmentation allows the system to identify hazards at depth boundaries without assuming the roadway is piecewise planar, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining single-camera feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from 2D image plane analysis to 3D depth space by computing disparity maps. This dimensional transformation enables accurate hazard detection at various distances without relying on inaccurate planar roadway assumptions, resolving the accuracy-cost contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Length of stationary object

If LiDAR systems are used for hazard detection, then detection range is improved, but system cost increases prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a computational copy of LiDAR-like depth information using inexpensive stereo camera pairs. By synthesizing depth maps through multi-view geometry, the system achieves LiDAR-equivalent detection range and capability at a fraction of the cost, eliminating the need for actual LiDAR hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the physical LiDAR scanning mechanism with optical stereo vision and computational disparity analysis. This replacement maintains long-range detection capability while dramatically reducing system cost, as cameras and processors are far cheaper than LiDAR systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If conventional hazard detection systems are used, then implementation is simpler, but detection of small distant hazards is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidsmall hazard detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances small hazard detection by computing disparity maps that provide explicit depth information. This dimensional transformation from 2D to 3D space allows the system to detect small distant hazards that would be imperceptible in standard images, while maintaining computational feasibility through efficient stereo matching algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250346235A1Hazard detection for autonomous and semi-autonomous systems and applications
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250346235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various examples, systems and methods are disclosed that detect hazards on a roadway by identifying discontinuities between pixels on a depth map. For example, two synchronized stereo cameras mounted on an ego-machine may generate images that may be used extract depth or disparity information. Because a hazard's height may cause an occlusion of the driving surface behind the hazard from a perspective of a camera(s), a discontinuity in disparity values may indicate the presence of a hazard. For example, the system may analyze pairs of pixels on the depth map and, when the system determines that a disparity between a pair of pixels satisfies a disparity threshold, the system may identify the pixel nearest the ego-machine as a hazard pixel.