Stereolithography Layer Plausibility Check for Orientation Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In additive manufacturing, particularly stereolithography, issues arise from object orientation errors leading to incomplete contact between large flat surfaces and the printing base, resulting in unnecessary support structures that impair surface quality and require additional effort for removal.

Innovation Solution

A plausibility checking method that compares the pixel sum of exposed areas between successive layers, emitting warnings or errors if the increase exceeds a predetermined factor, ensuring optimal object orientation and minimizing support structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CAM software automatically creates support structures to ensure complete contact with the zero plane, then manufacturing reliability is improved, but device complexity and surface quality deteriorate due to additional structures requiring removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a plausibility check before the actual 3D printing process. The method calculates the sum of pixels to be exposed for each layer in advance and verifies whether successive layers show unexpectedly large increases in exposed area. This pre-detection prevents the need for automatic support structure creation, as orientation errors are identified and corrected before manufacturing begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through an automated plausibility checking mechanism that monitors the relationship between successive layers. When the pixel sum increase exceeds a predetermined threshold, the system generates a warning signal or error message, providing immediate feedback to the operator. This feedback loop eliminates the need for conservative automatic support structure generation by enabling real-time detection and correction of orientation issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If CAM software automatically creates support structures to prevent orientation errors, then manufacturing reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to additional cleanup effort and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing reliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The plausibility check is performed as a preliminary action before the 3D printing process starts. By calculating and verifying the pixel sum relationship between successive layers in advance, the system identifies orientation errors early, preventing the need for subsequent support structure removal operations and thereby maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback mechanism detects orientation errors during the data preparation phase and alerts operators before printing begins. This early detection prevents wasted printing time and material, and eliminates the need for post-printing support structure removal, thus maintaining high productivity while ensuring manufacturing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If object orientation is changed to achieve complete contact with the zero plane, then manufacturing reliability is improved, but surface quality deteriorates in areas where support structures are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing reliabilityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The plausibility check performs preliminary verification of object orientation by analyzing the pixel sum relationship between successive layers before printing. This pre-check ensures that the object is properly oriented without requiring support structures, thereby maintaining both manufacturing reliability and surface quality without the need for corrective actions after printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If plausibility checking is performed to detect orientation errors, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional software processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The plausibility checking mechanism utilizes the existing pixel data already generated by the 3D printing software for layer-by-layer construction. By repurposing this existing data to perform orientation verification, the system achieves enhanced manufacturing precision without requiring separate specialized hardware or complex additional processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by using its own generated pixel data to verify correct object orientation. The plausibility check leverages the pixel sum information already calculated for 3D printing purposes, turning the existing data processing infrastructure into a dual-purpose tool that ensures manufacturing precision without adding external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3708340B1Plausibility testing method for additive production method, in particular rapid prototyping devices
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG
  • EP3708340B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3708340B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3708340B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a plausibility check method for rapid prototyping devices, in particular stereolithography devices. Input data (14), which is primarily in the form of graphic data, with each file representing a layer, is checked. Each layer has a plurality of pixels. The component to be printed in the respective layer is generated by the rapid prototyping device based on output data. The input data of two successive layers are checked, and the sum of all pixels to be exposed is determined for each layer. A signal (22) is output, in particular as a warning signal (26), if the pixel sum of a subsequent layer is greater than that of the previous layer by a predetermined factor.