Sterically Activated Ruthenium Complexes for Olefin Metathesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ruthenium complexes used in olefin metathesis reactions face challenges in scalability and efficiency due to complex synthesis pathways and the generation of large amounts of waste and by-products.

Innovation Solution

Development of new sterically activated ruthenium complexes with a benzylidene ligand containing a secondary carbon atom, which allows for a more efficient and scalable synthesis process without the need for additional chemical activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If complex synthesis pathways are used to create highly active ruthenium complexes, then catalytic activity is improved, but manufacturing complexity and waste generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidsynthesis pathway complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential activating feature (steric hindrance from bulky substituents) and separates it from the complex synthesis pathways. By using commercially available substrates with pre-installed bulky groups (tert-butyl, adamantyl, triphenylmethyl), the activation function is retained while eliminating multi-step synthesis complexity and waste-generating purification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs commercially available, inexpensive substrates that can be directly converted to active catalysts in single steps. These readily accessible starting materials replace complex, expensive synthesis intermediates, enabling scalable production without extensive purification while maintaining high catalytic activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If complex multi-step synthesis is used to prepare ruthenium complexes, then catalyst activity is improved, but scalability and waste reduction are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bulky activating substituents are pre-installed on the benzylidene ligand in commercially available substrates before ruthenium complex formation. This preliminary incorporation of the activating group eliminates the need for post-synthesis modification steps, enabling direct preparation of active catalysts from stable, off-the-shelf materials with improved scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the synthesis approach from multi-step sequential transformations to direct single-step reactions using commercially available substrates. This parameter change in synthetic strategy maintains the essential steric activation while dramatically improving ease of manufacture and scalability through simplified reaction conditions and procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If electron-acceptor substituents are added to activate Hoveyda catalysts, then initiation rate is improved, but synthesis complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitiation rateVSAvoidligand structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding electron-acceptor substituents to activate the catalyst (conventional approach), the patent inverts the strategy by using steric hindrance from bulky substituents to achieve activation. This inverted approach—using spatial effects rather than electronic effects—achieves high initiation rates while avoiding the synthesis complexity associated with electron-withdrawing group incorporation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent copies the successful activation strategy from Blechert-type catalysts (which use bulky substituents) and applies it to Hoveyda-type ruthenium complexes. By copying the steric activation concept rather than the electronic activation approach, the patent achieves rapid initiation while maintaining simpler ligand structures based on commercially available substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new ruthenium complexes exhibit high activity in olefin metathesis reactions at low temperatures, comparable to the highly active Ble-2 complex, while offering a more straightforward and environmentally friendly synthesis route.

Implementation Method 1

new sterically activated chelating ruthenium complexes, useful as catalysts and/or (pre)catalysts for olefin metathesis reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250051380A1New sterically activated chelating ruthenium complexes, method of their preparation and their use in olefin metathesis reactions
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 APEIRON SYNTHESIS
  • US20250051380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250051380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250051380A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject of the invention are new sterically activated chelating ruthenium complexes with the formula 1a, easy to obtain by efficient chemical reactions. The invention also concerns the method of obtaining and using ruthenium complexes with formula 1a as precatalysts and/or catalysts in a wide spectrum of known olefin metathesis reactions.