Sterile Container Closure Using Toggle-Joint Clamping Lever

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closures for sterile containers face issues with wear and tear, complex handling, and reduced clamping force over time due to the use of spring-elastic elements, leading to potential leakage during sterilization.

Innovation Solution

A closure design featuring a clamping lever that pivots into an open position through a form-fitting connection with a closure flap, allowing for easy adjustment and engagement, eliminating the need for spring-elastic elements and ensuring a secure, low-wear operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If spring-elastic elements are used in the latching connection, then the closure can be automatically reset and maintained under tension, but the components are subject to increased wear and the spring forces weaken over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic reset capabilityVSAvoidclamping force consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the spring-elastic elements from the closure mechanism entirely. Instead of using springs to provide reset force and maintain tension, the invention uses a purely mechanical cam and latch system where the cam profile geometry provides the necessary forces for automatic resetting and maintaining clamping pressure without any elastic components that would wear or weaken over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces durable but complex spring mechanisms with simpler, wear-resistant mechanical components. The cam and latch are designed as robust elements that can withstand repeated use without degradation, effectively creating a maintenance-free system that eliminates the reliability issues associated with spring fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Force

If the closure mechanism uses multiple components for latching, then the clamping force can be maintained, but the handling becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping forceVSAvoidhandling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into the cam component. The cam simultaneously provides the latching action, the reset force, and the clamping pressure maintenance through its integrated profile geometry. This merging of functions reduces the number of separate components the user must manipulate while maintaining effective clamping force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cam mechanism serves multiple purposes: it acts as the latching element, provides the spring-like reset force through its profile, maintains continuous clamping pressure on the seal, and guides the closure flap movement. This multi-functionality simplifies the overall mechanism and improves ease of operation while maintaining strong clamping force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If elastically deformable latching lugs are used, then manufacturing tolerances can be compensated, but the clamping force is determined by elastic resilience which may vary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance compensationVSAvoidclamping force variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter from elastic deformation to geometric constraint. Instead of relying on the elastic properties of deformable latching lugs, the invention uses the precise geometry of the cam profile to define and maintain the clamping force. The cam profile is designed with specific geometric parameters that ensure consistent clamping force regardless of manufacturing tolerances in other components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides simple and safe handling, high clamping forces to prevent leakage, and maintains consistent sealing without the risk of reduced clamping force over time, ensuring the container lid remains securely attached to the lower part.

Implementation Method 1

a closure flap (5) which can be rotated about a rotational axis (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational movement:

Implementation Method 2

a clamping lever (2), which can be brought from a closed clamping position lying above the dead center to an open pivoting position, pivotable about a pivot axis (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivoting movement:

Implementation Method 3

the clamping lever (2)... in its closed clamping position... lying above the dead center

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 4

which in its closed position is in a form-fitting tensile connection with the clamping lever (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile connection: Tension

Data Source

PatentEP2559395B1Closure for sterile container
Publication Date: 2018.10.17 INNOVATIONS MEDICAL
  • EP2559395B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2559395B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP2559395B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The lock (1) comprises a toggle-joint type clamping lever (2), which is brought in an opened pivoting position around a pivoting axis (4) from a closed clamping position. A locking cap (5) is rotated around a rotational axis (7), where the clamping lever is brought in its opened position by rotating the locking cap from its closing position.