Sterile Pollen Application for Amaranthus Weed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Herbicide resistance in weeds poses a significant challenge for effective weed control, leading to substantial crop yield losses and economic burdens, as existing methods are not sustainable due to the development of resistant biotypes.

Innovation Solution

Artificially pollinating Amaranthus species with an effective amount of pollen to reduce their fitness, using precision or non-precision tool-assisted applications during the flowering season, which can inhibit seed development and germination, thereby controlling weed populations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If herbicides are used for weed control, then weed control effectiveness is improved, but herbicide resistance in weeds develops leading to reduced long-term effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidherbicide resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies sterile pollen to convert a potentially harmful substance (excessive pollen that could cause allergens or disrupt ecosystems) into a beneficial weed control tool. The sterile pollen competes with fertile pollen for fertilization, preventing seed production without using herbicides, thus avoiding resistance development while maintaining control effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses sterile pollen as an intermediary substance between the pollinator and the weed plant. This intermediary competes for fertilization but cannot produce viable offspring, effectively reducing weed population without direct chemical intervention that would select for resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If traditional weed control methods are used, then immediate weed suppression is achieved, but crop yield losses continue due to resistant biotypes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop yieldVSAvoidsustainability of weed control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies sterile pollen during the flowering season before weeds can produce and disperse seeds. This preliminary action prevents the establishment of resistant biotypes by stopping reproduction at the source, ensuring long-term productivity without the sustainability issues of herbicide resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the natural pollination process, which normally benefits weeds by enabling seed production, into a control mechanism. By introducing sterile pollen that competes for fertilization, the natural reproductive process becomes harmful to weed population growth, protecting crop yields sustainably

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If sterile pollen is applied to control weeds, then seed production is reduced, but multiple applications are required during flowering season

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed population reductionVSAvoidnumber of applications required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic applications of sterile pollen throughout the flowering season. Rather than a single application, multiple timed applications ensure continuous competition for fertilization as flowers bloom, maintaining reliable weed population reduction despite the time investment required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous weed control pressure by applying sterile pollen repeatedly during the extended flowering period. This continuity ensures that as new flowers open, they are immediately exposed to sterile pollen competition, preventing any gap in the control action that would allow seed production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12193435B2Methods of controlling weed of the <i>Amaranth </i>genus
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 WEEDOUT LTD

AI summary

Methods of Amaranthus control are provided, comprising, artificially pollinating an Amaranthus species at a growth area with an effective amount of pollen that reduces fitness of the at least one Amaranthus species, the effective amount comprising 1 mg to 1 gram per plant per application using a precision tool-assisted application or 10 gram to 100 kg per acre per application using a non-precision tool-assisted application during a flowering season of the Amaranthus species.