Sterilization Label Reissuance Tracking for Instrument Set Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The frequent reissuance of sterilization labels for medical instruments is time-consuming and inefficient, with existing systems lacking recognition of reissuance reasons, making it difficult to implement effective countermeasures to reduce their frequency.

Innovation Solution

An instrument management system that includes a device with a memory and processor to track and count the reasons for reissuing sterilization labels, allowing operators to specify and store reissuance reasons, thereby identifying types of reissuance and reducing their frequency through targeted countermeasures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sterilization labels are reissued frequently due to damage or expiration, then the medical instruments can maintain sterilization status, but the time and effort required for label management increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterilization status maintenanceVSAvoidlabel management time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by automatically tracking and recording each sterilization label's usage history, reissuance reasons, and timing information. This feedback mechanism enables analysis of label performance patterns, allowing the system to identify which labels require frequent reissuance and adjust management strategies accordingly, thereby reducing unnecessary reissuance time while maintaining sterilization reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-establishing a database structure and tracking framework before label reissuance events occur. The system proactively monitors label status, expiration dates, and reissuance histories, enabling predictive management of when labels will need replacement and optimizing the timing of reissuance operations to minimize time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If operators manually track reissuance reasons without a systematic approach, then the process remains simple, but the ability to identify patterns and implement countermeasures is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking system complexityVSAvoidreissuance reason analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the reissuance tracking function into distinct modular components: a database structure for storing label information, a tracking mechanism for recording reissuance events, an analysis module for processing reissuance reasons, and a display interface for presenting insights. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex information processing while maintaining manageable system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary database structure as a mediator between the manual reissuance process and the analysis capability. The database serves as an intermediary that captures, stores, and organizes reissuance reason data, enabling the analysis module to process this information and generate insights without requiring direct complex interactions between operators and the analysis system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the number of sterilization labels is increased to avoid reissuance, then the availability of sterile instruments is improved, but the waste of packaging materials and resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument availabilityVSAvoidpackaging material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from tracking actual label performance and reissuance patterns to optimize label allocation strategies. By analyzing which labels are used most frequently and for how long, the system can adjust the initial number of labels allocated to different instrument sets, ensuring sufficient availability while minimizing excessive labels that would waste packaging materials and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by monitoring and analyzing temporal patterns in label usage and reissuance. By changing the parameter of tracking time-based data (such as label lifespan, reissuance frequency over time), the system can determine optimal label quantities and allocation strategies that balance instrument availability with resource efficiency, reducing packaging material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12586678B2Instrument management device for medical instrument, instrument management system, and instrument management method for medical instrument
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 DGSHAPE CORP
  • US12586678B2 patent drawing
  • US12586678B2 patent drawing
  • US12586678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An instrument management device includes a memory and a processor to execute a program stored in the memory to perform display processing, acquisition processing, and counting processing. In the display processing, in reissuing a sterilization label that is issued when sterilization processing is performed on an instrument set including medical instruments, a reissuance reason registration screen including a reason specifying area via which an operator specifies a type of reissuance reason is displayed on a display device. In the acquisition processing, the type of reissuance reason specified in the reason specifying area is acquired and stored in the memory. In the counting processing, for each type of reissuance reason stored in the memory, a number of times the sterilization label has been reissued for a reason of the type of reissuance reason is counted.