Stillpipe Radar Level Gauging Under Diameter Mismatch and Large Openings
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Radar level gauging in stillpipes faces inaccuracies due to frequency dispersion and mismatch between the stillpipe inner diameter and antenna diameter, as well as interference from large openings, leading to costly manufacturing and installation requirements for stringent diameter tolerances.
Innovation Solution
The method involves calculating the phase velocity of wireless signals reflected from the material in the tank using a processing system, which allows for robust level determination by converting dispersed phase velocity into normal velocity, reducing the need for frequency interpolation and enhancing accuracy despite diameter mismatches and large openings.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If strict diameter tolerance is enforced between stillpipe and antenna, then measurement precision is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the measurement parameter from direct time-of-flight measurement to phase velocity-based measurement. By measuring phase velocity and using the relationship between phase velocity, frequency, and wavelength, the system can calculate the distance to the material surface. This parameter change makes the measurement less sensitive to diameter mismatches between stillpipe and antenna.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the conventional mechanical/optical time-of-flight measurement system with an electromagnetic phase velocity measurement system. Instead of measuring the direct travel time of radar pulses, the system measures the phase velocity of electromagnetic waves propagating through the stillpipe, which is less affected by geometric mismatches.
2Ease of operation
If large openings are provided in stillpipe for viscous material flow, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent converts the harmful effect of large openings (which cause electromagnetic field disturbances and mode conversions) into a beneficial measurement approach. By using phase velocity measurement and analyzing the frequency-dependent behavior of electromagnetic waves, the system can actually utilize the field disturbances caused by large openings as additional information about the material level, rather than treating them purely as noise.
3Ease of manufacture
If mismatch between stillpipe and antenna diameter is allowed, then ease of manufacture is improved, but frequency dispersion increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a dynamic measurement approach that adapts to the actual electromagnetic field conditions in the stillpipe. By measuring phase velocity across different frequencies and analyzing the dispersion characteristics, the system dynamically adjusts its measurement parameters to compensate for mismatches between stillpipe and antenna diameters, maintaining reliable measurements despite geometric variations.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach provides accurate level measurements with reduced costs and increased robustness, tolerating greater mismatches between antenna and stillpipe diameters, and minimizes the impact of large openings, thereby improving measurement stability and reducing errors.
Implementation Method 1
radar signals are transmitted towards and reflected off the surface of the material in the tank
Implementation Method 2
radar signals are transmitted towards and reflected off the surface of the material in the tank
Implementation Method 3
calculating a phase velocity of the wireless signals reflected off the material
Implementation Method 4
accounts for waveguide dispersion and allows for robust accuracy without stringent diameter mismatches
Data Source
AI summary
A method includes transmitting wireless signals towards a material in a tank and receiving wireless signals reflected off the material. The method also includes calculating a phase velocity of the wireless signals reflected off the material and identifying a level of the material in the tank using the phase velocity. Calculating the phase velocity of the wireless signals could include identifying a plurality of linearly-spaced frequencies and performing linear interpolation using the data identifying the wireless signals to identify data points at the linearly-spaced frequencies. The identification of the data points at the linearly-spaced frequencies could represent the only interpolation operation performed during the calculation of the phase velocity and the identification of the level of the material. Moreover, a mismatch could exist between an inner diameter of a stillpipe through which the wireless signals are transmitted and a diameter of an antenna used to receive the wireless signals.


