Electrical Stimulation Control System With Dynamic Pulse Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuromodulation systems are inadequate in providing continuous, robust, and efficiently adjustable electrical stimulation for various applications, lacking the ability to reliably and continuously apply different types of electrical stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for delivering electrical stimulation that includes a control system and a stimulation stack with process blocks for continuously monitoring and adjusting electrical stimulation, providing robust complex stimulation, implementing sham stimulation, and compensating for hardware limitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current neuromodulation systems are used to transmit electrical signals, then user performance improvement is achieved, but the system cannot provide continuous, robust, and efficiently adjustable electrical stimulation for various applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to provide electrical stimulation for various different applicationsVSAvoidcontinuous and robust electrical stimulation delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the electrical stimulation delivery into discrete pulse trains with configurable parameters (pulse width, frequency, amplitude, cycle length). Each pulse train can be independently configured for different applications, allowing versatile stimulation patterns while maintaining reliable delivery through standardized control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts stimulation parameters in real-time based on user feedback and performance metrics. The control system modifies pulse characteristics during operation to optimize effectiveness for different tasks and applications, enabling continuous adaptation while maintaining robust delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If electrical stimulation parameters are adjusted to suit different applications, then adaptability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of electrical stimulationVSAvoidsystem complexity for receiving adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses a universal interface that accepts various input types (manual adjustments, automated feedback, pre-programmed protocols) through a single standardized mechanism. This allows multiple functions and applications to be served by one adaptable control architecture, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes stimulation parameters (amplitude, frequency, pulse width, cycle length) through a standardized control interface that manages all parameter adjustments uniformly. This approach allows versatile parameter modification without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same control mechanisms handle all parameter changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring and adjustment of electrical stimulation is implemented, then stimulation accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of electrical stimulation adjustmentVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring and adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where user performance and physiological responses are continuously monitored and used to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. This feedback mechanism improves stimulation accuracy by ensuring parameters remain optimized for current conditions without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment of stimulation parameters based on pre-programmed algorithms and real-time feedback. The system monitors its own performance and automatically modifies delivery characteristics, reducing the need for complex external monitoring equipment and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250065108A1System and method for delivering electrical stimulation
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 FLOW NEUROSCIENCE INC
  • US20250065108A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065108A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065108A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for delivering electrical stimulation includes a control system and a stimulation stack. Additionally or alternatively, the system can include and/or be configured to interface with any or all of: an electrical stimulation device, a user device, a client application, and/or any other suitable components. A method for delivering electrical stimulation includes receiving an input and delivering electrical stimulation based on an electrical stimulation plan. Additionally or alternatively, the method can include any or all of: determining an electrical stimulation plan based on the input; requesting a suspension of the electrical stimulation plan, requesting an adjustment to the electrical stimulation plan; requesting sham stimulation in the electrical stimulation plan; requesting monitoring of the electrical stimulation plan; requesting a trim adjustment to the electrical stimulation plan; checking the electrical stimulation plan; providing an output to the user; repeating any or all of the above processes; and/or any other suitable processes.