Shallow Trench Isolation Liner and Fill Process for FinFET Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fin-based field effect transistor (FinFET) integration schemes using enhanced High Aspect Ratio Process (eHARP) for shallow trench isolation (STI) gap fill suffer from poor film density, leading to severe STI-oxide recess and fin damage, resulting in poor device performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multiple protective liners, including an in-situ steam generation (ISSG)-based first liner layer and silicon nitride (SiN) or poly-silicon second liner layer, followed by an enhanced high aspect ratio process (eHARP) fill and subsequent polishing, etching back, and refilling with high density plasma (HDP) material, with optional silicon deposition for additional protection during downstream processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If eHARP process is used for STI gap fill, then trench filling is achieved, but film density is poor leading to STI-oxide recess and fin damage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSTI gap fill qualityVSAvoidfilm density
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the STI formation process into multiple sequential steps with different fill materials (eHARP followed by HDP), where each step addresses specific requirements. The eHARP step provides initial trench filling while the subsequent HDP step provides high-density refill, thereby resolving the contradiction between achieving gap fill and ensuring film density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite approach by combining two different fill materials (eHARP material and HDP material) in sequence. Each material contributes its strengths: eHARP for aspect ratio handling and HDP for high density, together creating a composite STI structure that overcomes the limitations of using either material alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If single liner layer is used, then process complexity is low, but etch stopping and protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliner structure complexityVSAvoidetch stopping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the liner structure into multiple functional layers (first liner layer and second liner layer), where each layer provides specific protection functions. This segmentation enables sufficient etch stopping and fin protection while maintaining a systematic approach to the increased complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies liner layers beforehand to provide protective cushioning during subsequent etching and processing steps. The liners are deposited in advance to prevent fin damage and provide etch stopping, thereby protecting critical structures before harmful processes occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If no protective liner is used, then process steps are reduced, but fin damage occurs during downstream wet etch processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess efficiencyVSAvoidfin damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces liner layers as intermediary protective structures between the fin structures and harmful wet etch processes. These liners act as mediators that prevent direct contact between etchants and fins, thereby eliminating fin damage while allowing downstream processing to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective liner layers are deposited beforehand to provide cushioning protection against subsequent wet etch processes. This prior protection enables safe execution of downstream processing steps that would otherwise cause fin damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the etch stopping and removal rates, reducing fin damage and improving device performance by providing effective protection and density in the STI layer formation.

Implementation Method 1

a first liner layer (e.g., an in-situ steam generation (ISSG)-based layer)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIn-situ steam generation (ISSG): Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

refilling the set of trenches with a high density plasma (HDP) material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh density plasma (HDP): Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS9385192B2Shallow trench isolation integration methods and devices formed thereby
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US9385192B2 patent drawing
  • US9385192B2 patent drawing
  • US9385192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present invention generally relate to approaches for forming a semiconductor device such as a TSV device having a “buffer zone” or gap layer between the TSV and transistor(s). The gap layer is typically filled with a low stress thin film fill material that controls stresses and crack formation on the devices. Further, the gap layer ensures a certain spatial distance between TSVs and transistors to reduce the adverse effects of temperature excursion.