Stochastic Evidence Aggregation for Cascading Fault Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing evidence aggregation theories fail to effectively handle causal relationships between conclusions, leading to incorrect diagnoses in cascading fault situations, as they are static and ignore previous evidence, which is crucial in domains with strong causal relationships.

Innovation Solution

A stochastic process-based approach for evidence aggregation using a Kalman filter to handle noise and update relevant states, combined with a weighted averaging scheme to derive a diagnostic state from multiple diagnostic algorithms, incorporating causal relationships and dynamic updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static evidence aggregation theories are used, then the aggregation process is simple, but causal relationships between conclusions are not handled correctly and previous evidence is ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaggregation process complexityVSAvoiddiagnostic accuracy in cascading fault situations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static evidence aggregation process into a dynamic one by modeling belief states as time-evolving stochastic processes. The belief state at any time t is updated based on the previous belief state and new evidence, allowing the system to capture temporal dependencies and causal relationships between evidence items while maintaining a manageable computational framework through the use of transition matrices and stochastic modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If dynamic updates incorporating previous evidence are implemented, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but the aggregation process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidaggregation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation of evidence aggregation from static probability values to dynamic belief state vectors that evolve over time. By representing the system state as a belief vector and using transition matrices to model how beliefs change in response to evidence, the system achieves dynamic updating capability while maintaining computational tractability through parameterized models rather than exhaustive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7778943B2Stochastic evidence aggregation system of failure modes utilizing a modified dempster-shafer theory
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7778943B2 patent drawing
  • US7778943B2 patent drawing
  • US7778943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for obtaining diagnostic information, such as evidence about a mechanism, within an algorithmic framework, including filtering and aggregating the information through, for instance, a stochastic process. The output may be an overall belief value relative to a presence of an item such as, for example, a fault in the mechanism.