Stochastic Ising Optimization for Low-Cost Pseudo Quantum Annealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optimization techniques, such as quantum annealing, face challenges in reducing calculation time and hardware costs, particularly in preparing an appropriate operating environment for quantum devices.

Innovation Solution

An optimization device and method using stochastic calculation on a quantum annealing model with a transverse magnetic field, applying a series of formulas satisfying specific state update conditions to optimize an Ising model, including conditions for spin states, relationships between spin states, and interactions between spins in different trotter layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If quantum annealing technique is used, then calculation time is significantly reduced, but device mounting and operation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation timeVSAvoiddevice mounting and operation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the copying principle by implementing a classical computer system that simulates quantum annealing processes. Instead of requiring actual quantum hardware, the invention creates a software-based copy of quantum annealing behavior using classical stochastic calculation methods, thereby achieving quantum-like optimization performance without quantum device costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the quantum mechanical system with a classical computational system. By replacing quantum hardware requirements with classical stochastic algorithms that model quantum annealing behavior, the invention eliminates the need for complex quantum device mounting and operation while maintaining the computational benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If quantum annealing technique is used, then optimization performance is improved, but preparation of appropriate operating environment becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization performanceVSAvoidoperating environment preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary classical computational layer that mediates between the optimization problem and the solution. This intermediary system uses stochastic calculations to simulate quantum annealing effects, providing a bridge that achieves quantum-level optimization performance without requiring actual quantum hardware or complex quantum operating environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If classical computer optimization is used, then device cost is reduced, but calculation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice costVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the computational approach to include stochastic elements that simulate quantum thermal effects. By changing the optimization algorithm parameters to incorporate probabilistic state transitions and temperature-like parameters, the classical system achieves faster convergence times comparable to quantum annealing while maintaining lower hardware costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260057277A1Optimization device, optimization method, and program
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 TOHOKU UNIV
  • US20260057277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057277A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057277A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspect of the invention includes an optimization unit configured to perform optimization, by stochastic calculation, on a Hamiltonian of a quantum annealing model, which is an Ising model representing the optimization target in a state in which a transverse magnetic field is applied, in which the optimization unit performs the optimization by executing a series of formulas satisfying a state update condition, which is a condition related to an update of a spin state, until a predetermined end condition is satisfied, and the state update condition includes a first condition representing the spin state, a second condition representing a relationship between the spin states obtained at different times, a third condition representing a relationship between adjacent trotter layers, and a fourth condition including an amount representing an intensity of an interaction between the same or different spins existing in the same trotter layer, an amount representing a magnitude of energy of a spin itself, and an amount representing an intensity of an interaction between spins belonging to different trotter layers.