Stochastic Variation Estimation in Lithography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithography processes face challenges in accurately predicting and controlling stochastic variations in resist processing, such as feature edge/width roughness, due to limitations in modeling dose sensitivity and quencher effects, which affect the precision of pattern transfer in semiconductor manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a calibrated stochastic model that incorporates resist process dose sensitivity and quencher parameters to predict stochastic variables like line edge roughness, using a hardware computer to design or modify patterning process parameters, and calibrating models with measured data to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional lithography modeling is used to predict pattern transfer, then the process is simpler and faster, but the prediction accuracy of stochastic variations such as line edge roughness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of stochastic variationsVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stochastic variation prediction into multiple independent components: dose sensitivity prediction, quencher effect prediction, and line edge roughness prediction. Each component is modeled separately using specific equations (Eq. 1 for dose sensitivity, Eq. 2 for quencher effects, Eq. 3 for LER), allowing the complex prediction task to be divided into manageable parts that can be computed efficiently and calibrated independently with experimental data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If resist process dose sensitivity and quencher effects are incorporated into the stochastic model, then the prediction accuracy of line edge roughness improves, but the computational complexity and calibration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precision in patterning processVSAvoidcalibration difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through calibration procedures where model predictions are compared with experimental measurements. Eq. 1 includes a calibration factor CF_dose, Eq. 2 includes CF_quencher, and Eq. 3 includes CF_LER that are determined by fitting model predictions to measured data. This feedback loop allows the model to be continuously refined and adjusted to match actual process behavior, improving prediction accuracy while providing a systematic approach to calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a calibrated stochastic model is used to predict line edge roughness, then the control of patterning process precision is enhanced, but the time and resources required for model calibration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of pattern transferVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calibration actions by establishing baseline calibration factors (CF_dose, CF_quencher, CF_LER) through initial experimental measurements. Once calibrated, the model can predict stochastic variations for new patterning conditions without requiring re-calibration, as the calibration factors capture the fundamental process characteristics. This preliminary calibration establishes a reliable foundation that can be reused across multiple predictions, reducing the time investment required for each subsequent prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10795267B2Model for estimating stochastic variation
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US10795267B2 patent drawing
  • US10795267B2 patent drawing
  • US10795267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including: obtaining a resist process dose sensitivity value for a patterning process; applying the resist process dose sensitivity value to a stochastic model providing values of a stochastic variable as a function of resist process dose sensitivity to obtain a value of the stochastic variable; and designing or modifying a parameter of the patterning process based on the stochastic variable value.