Stone Impact Simulator Energy Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing stone impact simulators are noisy and self-destructive, leading to a shorter service life due to excessive wear and damage from projectile impact and ricochet.

Innovation Solution

A stone impact simulator with a projectile propulsion section and a capture section that includes a frustoconical energy dissipation element, a rebound block with an arcuate face, and a curved ramp to safely capture and dissipate the projectile's energy, reducing wear and tear on the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional stone impact simulator discharges projectiles at high velocity to test impact resistance, then the testing capability is improved, but the device suffers from excessive noise and self-destructive wear leading to shorter service life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidnoise and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful kinetic energy of ricocheting projectiles into a beneficial containment mechanism. The frustoconical chamber with its specific geometry (cone angle 15-45 degrees) captures the ricocheting projectiles and directs them into a collection receptacle, transforming the harmful noise-generating ricochet into a controlled energy dissipation process that protects the device and extends service life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The frustoconical chamber acts as an intermediary element between the test sample and the projectile launch mechanism. It mediates the interaction by providing a controlled environment for projectile ricochet, preventing direct contact between high-velocity projectiles and the device structure, thereby reducing wear and noise while maintaining testing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If the projectile capture section uses a frustoconical wall with a specific cone angle, then the energy dissipation effectiveness is improved, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprojectile energy dissipationVSAvoidcapture section structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the frustoconical chamber geometry by specifying a cone angle range of 15-45 degrees (with preference for 15-30 degrees). This parameter optimization balances energy dissipation effectiveness with structural simplicity. The specific angular range provides sufficient energy dissipation while avoiding excessive structural complexity, representing an optimized parameter selection that resolves the contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the rebound block has a larger radius of curvature, then the projectile capture effectiveness is improved, but the device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprojectile capture effectivenessVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses the radius of curvature requirement by utilizing the three-dimensional space within the frustoconical chamber. Rather than increasing the radius in a single dimension, the conical geometry provides spatial distribution that achieves effective projectile capture while maintaining compact overall device dimensions. The angular geometry compensates for the radius constraint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The simulator operates more quietly and has a longer service life by effectively capturing and dissipating the projectile's energy, minimizing damage to the device and projectiles, and allowing for a wide range of speeds from 10 to 200 miles per hour.

Implementation Method 1

a projectile energy dissipation element between the rebound block and the spent projectile storage compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the frustoconical wall has a cone angle of between 5 degrees and 20 degrees

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy dissipation:

Implementation Method 3

The rebound block may have an arcuate face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

a rebound block, a spent projectile storage compartment and a projectile energy dissipation element between the rebound block and the spent projectile storage compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNormal force: Force

Implementation Method 5

The projectile capture section may further include a curved ramp between the rebound block and the projectile energy dissipation element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Implementation Method 6

That curved ramp may include a shallow, arcuate channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNormal force: Force

Data Source

PatentUS9958366B2Stone impact simulator
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9958366B2 patent drawing
  • US9958366B2 patent drawing
  • US9958366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stone impact simulator is provided. That stone impact simulator includes a projectile propulsion section to propel a projectile toward a test sample and a projectile capture section to capture the projectile after the projectile ricochets off of the test sample. The projectile capture section includes a rebound block, a spent projectile storage compartment and a projectile energy dissipation element between the rebound block and the spent projectile storage compartment.