Stop Element Gap Control for Haptic Feedback in Vehicle Input Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing input units in center console units of motor vehicles, such as those used for multimedia, navigation, and radio devices, face challenges in providing reliable haptic feedback with minimal actuation paths, as they often lack precise control and adequate tactile feedback due to manufacturing tolerance issues.

Innovation Solution

A device with a stop element that limits the movement path of a feeler element to a predetermined gap dimension, utilizing a spiral spring and extension sleeve for restoring force transmission, and allowing elastic deformation transverse to the actuation direction, along with precise positioning and fixing during assembly, to enhance haptic feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If minimal actuation path is used, then device compactness is improved, but haptic feedback quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation pathVSAvoidhaptic feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stop element is designed to be elastically deformable in the transverse direction, allowing it to dynamically change its mechanical properties during actuation. This elasticity provides tactile feedback to the user while maintaining minimal actuation travel in the primary direction, thus resolving the contradiction between compactness and haptic feedback quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the mechanical parameters of the stop element by allowing elastic deformation in the transverse direction while maintaining rigid constraint in the actuation direction. This parameter differentiation enables the system to provide rich haptic feedback through transverse elasticity while keeping the actuation path minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If component tolerances are used for gap dimension, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but gap precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing complexityVSAvoidgap dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The stop element acts as an intermediary component that defines the gap dimension. By making the stop element elastically deformable in the transverse direction, it compensates for manufacturing tolerances in other components while maintaining precise control over the gap dimension in the actuation direction, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing ease and gap precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If transverse elasticity is added, then haptic feedback is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedbackVSAvoidmechanical structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop element is designed with differentiated local properties: rigid in the actuation direction to maintain minimal travel and elastic in the transverse direction to provide haptic feedback. This localized quality differentiation improves haptic feedback without requiring complex additional mechanisms, thus resolving the contradiction between haptic feedback quality and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved haptic feedback and precise control with minimal actuation paths by adjusting gap dimensions and incorporating a restoring mechanism, enhancing user experience through better tactile feedback and tolerance compensation.

Implementation Method 1

an extension sleeve for transmitting the spring force is arranged in a space between the stop element and the actuating element, following the coil spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a stop element is provided which, by positioning and fixing it to the base element during assembly, limits the movement path of the sensing element to a predetermined gap dimension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the stop element and/or the actuating element is designed to be elastically deformable transversely to the direction of actuation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3450243B1Device for mechanical control of an electric or electronic input unit
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 MARQUARDT GMBH
  • EP3450243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3450243B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3450243B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A device 1 for the mechanical actuation of an electrical or electronic input unit, in particular for center console units of motor vehicles, is proposed, wherein a tactile element 7 for actuating a sensor unit and/or an actuator unit is movable in an actuation direction relative to a base element against a restoring force, characterized in that a stop element 4 is provided which, by positioning and fixing on the base element 2 during assembly, limits the movement path of the tactile element 7 to a predetermined gap dimension.