Fulfillment Center Storage Allocation for Sales Velocity Shifts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fulfillment center operations face inefficiencies in storage allocation and order fulfillment processes, particularly in optimizing storage plans for inventory management and timely product delivery, which are crucial for meeting increasing online customer demands.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method for managing storage allocation in fulfillment centers that involves obtaining inventory data, determining sales velocity and temperature zones, and generating a storage allocation plan using machine learning to assign SKUs to specific storage systems and slots, considering transportation capacity and throughput ratings, while maintaining an optimal empty-slot ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If storage allocation is optimized using machine learning and multiple parameters, then productivity and throughput are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing optimal storage slot assignments for multiple SKUs before actual order fulfillment occurs. The machine learning model generates predicted allocation plans in advance based on historical data, so that when orders arrive, the system can quickly retrieve and execute pre-determined optimal assignments rather than calculating from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of complex optimization problems by generating predicted allocation plans that replicate the outcomes of full machine learning optimization. These predicted plans serve as lightweight representations that can be quickly processed and executed without requiring the full computational power of the original ML model during real-time order fulfillment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If storage allocation considers multiple factors including temperature zones and transportation capacity, then manufacturing precision of allocation plans is improved, but calculation time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation plan accuracyVSAvoidplan generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates optimal storage allocations considering all constraints (temperature zones, transportation capacity, slot capacities) before actual fulfillment needs arise. By performing the complex multi-factor optimization in advance, the system stores the results as predicted allocation plans that can be quickly retrieved and executed without re-running the full optimization calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model creates simplified copy representations of the complex multi-constraint optimization problem. These predicted allocation plans capture the essence of optimal assignments under multiple constraints but in a format that requires minimal processing time during actual order fulfillment, effectively copying the computational heavy lifting to a pre-processing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system dynamically updates storage allocation plans based on sales velocity changes, then adaptability is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to sales changesVSAvoidupdate frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by monitoring sales velocity changes and triggering allocation plan updates only when predefined thresholds are exceeded or at scheduled intervals. Instead of continuously recalculating allocations in response to every minor fluctuation, the system periodically assesses whether changes warrant re-optimization, balancing adaptability with computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by monitoring actual sales velocity against predicted values and using this information to trigger selective updates of allocation plans. When feedback indicates significant deviations from expected sales patterns, the system activates re-optimization to adapt to new conditions, while maintaining stability during normal operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12579511B1Managing allocation of storages in fulfillment center
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 COUPANG CORP
  • US12579511B1 patent drawing
  • US12579511B1 patent drawing
  • US12579511B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing storage allocation in a warehouse includes obtaining inventory data including SKUs, determining a sales velocity of each of the SKUs, generating a storage allocation plan that assigns each SKU to a particular storage system among a plurality of storage systems and a particular slot of the particular storage system based on at least one of the sales velocity of the SKU, the temperature zone of the storage system, or a capacity of a transportation device of the storage system, and transmitting the storage allocation plan to the transportation device to move products corresponding to the SKUs in accordance with the storage allocation plan.