Hardware Storage Device Array Reliability Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining hardware storage device failures are inaccurate, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, lacking flexibility in identifying and addressing storage issues effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize sensors to detect environmental factors affecting hardware storage devices, analyze operational characteristics, predict failure rates, and modify hardware configurations and environmental parameters to improve reliability and prevent data loss, by implementing a processor-driven algorithm that assesses risks and modifies the functionality of hardware storage devices to meet acceptable tolerance levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to determine hardware storage device failures, then the process is simple, but the accuracy is low and flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple independent analysis components: environmental factor detection via sensors, operational characteristic analysis, failure rate prediction, and configuration analysis. Each segment handles a specific aspect of failure detection, improving overall accuracy while allowing modular implementation that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of environmental factors and operational characteristics before actual failure occurs. By continuously monitoring and analyzing these parameters in advance, the system predicts potential failures proactively, improving detection accuracy while establishing a structured framework that manages complexity through prevention-oriented design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive analysis of environmental factors and operational characteristics is performed, then failure prediction accuracy improves, but time consumption and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage device reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring and analysis cycles for environmental factors and operational characteristics. By analyzing data at optimized intervals rather than continuously, the system maintains high reliability through regular assessments while reducing time consumption and resource usage compared to continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs analysis at selective depths based on risk levels and operational context. For normal operations, partial analysis of key parameters is sufficient to maintain reliability, while more comprehensive analysis is triggered only when anomalies or high-risk conditions are detected, thereby reducing overall time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of array parameters and failure rates is conducted, then data loss risk assessment improves, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment precisionVSAvoidprocessing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of analysis depth to different array parameters and devices based on their individual risk profiles and operational characteristics. High-risk devices and critical parameters receive detailed analysis for precise risk assessment, while low-risk elements receive streamlined analysis, optimizing energy consumption while maintaining assessment precision where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If the system modifies hardware configurations to improve reliability, then data loss prevention improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray reliabilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system modifies operational parameters and configuration settings based on analyzed risk factors and failure predictions. By dynamically adjusting parameters such as redundancy levels, data placement strategies, and operational thresholds, the system improves reliability while using software-based parameter changes rather than permanent hardware modifications, thereby managing configuration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10901841B2Hardware storage device optimization
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10901841B2 patent drawing
  • US10901841B2 patent drawing
  • US10901841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for improving operation of a memory device is provided. The method includes detecting, via sensors, environmental factors affecting an operation of individual hardware storage devices within an array of hardware storage devices. The environmental factors are analyzed with respect to operational characteristics of the individual hardware storage devices and a resulting expected failure rate for the individual hardware storage devices is determined. Array parameters associated with a hardware configuration for the array of hardware storage devices with respect to each expected failure rate are determined and associated issues are detected. Reliability characteristics and associated risks of the array of hardware storage devices are determined and a functionality of the array of hardware storage devices is modified.