Storage Controller Compression for End-to-End Encrypted Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data storage systems face inefficiencies in data compression and encryption processes, where encrypted data is often stored uncompressed due to insufficient processing resources, leading to suboptimal storage utilization and performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing dynamic compression with dynamic multi-stage encryption, where the storage controller decrypts, compresses, and re-encrypts data, leveraging its processing resources to preserve end-to-end encryption and enhance data storage efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the host compresses data before encrypting and sending to the storage controller, then storage space is preserved, but processing resources of the host are excessively depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage spaceVSAvoidprocessing resources of host
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The compression function is extracted from the host and relocated to the storage controller. The host only performs encryption and sends encrypted data, while the storage controller performs decryption and compression, thereby preserving host processing resources while still achieving storage space optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The traditional sequence of compression then encryption is inverted to encryption then compression. Encrypted data is sent to the storage controller, which decrypts and then compresses the data before storage. This inversion allows compression to occur on encrypted data without depleting host resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Quantity of substance

If the storage controller compresses encrypted data, then storage space is reduced, but processing resources are consumed and compression effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage spaceVSAvoidprocessing resources of storage controller
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The compression operation is applied to decrypted data rather than encrypted data. The storage controller decrypts the incoming encrypted data, then compresses the plaintext data which yields better compression ratios, and finally re-encrypts the compressed data for storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

Decryption is performed as a preliminary action before compression. By decrypting the data first, the storage controller enables more effective compression since plaintext data has redundancies that can be compressed, whereas encrypted data appears random and compresses poorly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the host bypasses compression to maintain input/output operations, then processing resources are preserved, but storage efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput/output operationsVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The compression function is extracted from the host's I/O path and relocated to the storage controller. This allows the host to maintain high I/O performance by only performing encryption and transmission, while the storage controller handles compression in the background without impacting host I/O operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If end-to-end encryption is implemented, then data security is improved, but compression effectiveness is reduced because encrypted data is difficult to compress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidcompression effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional encryption-compression sequence is inverted to compression-encryption at the host, and then decryption-compression-encryption at the storage controller. This allows compression to occur on plaintext data at both ends while maintaining end-to-end encryption security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption process is segmented into multiple stages: host encryption for transmission security, storage controller decryption for compression, and re-encryption for storage security. This segmentation allows compression to occur on plaintext data while maintaining security at critical points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11423158B2Dynamic compression with dynamic multi-stage encryption for a data storage system
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11423158B2 patent drawing
  • US11423158B2 patent drawing
  • US11423158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic compression with dynamic multi-stage encryption for a data storage system in accordance with the present description includes, in one aspect of the present description, preserves end-to-end encryption between a host and a storage controller while compressing data which was received from the host in encrypted but uncompressed form, using MIPs and other processing resources of the storage controller instead of the host. In one embodiment, the storage controller decrypts encrypted but uncompressed data received from the host to unencrypted data and compresses the unencrypted data to compressed data. The storage controller then encrypts the compressed data to encrypted, compressed data and stores the encrypted, compressed data in a storage device controlled by the storage controller. Other aspects and advantages may be realized, depending upon the particular application.