Storage System Data Placement for Cost and Speed Trade-offs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content addressable storage systems face high costs for storing large amounts of data, and existing solutions do not efficiently manage storage between expensive and less expensive storage devices, leading to inefficient use of resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system with a primary storage system using more expensive devices and a secondary storage system using less expensive devices, where content is replicated from the primary to the secondary system based on user-defined policies, allowing for deletion from the primary system to free up space and maintain access through the secondary system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If data is stored on expensive high-performance storage devices, then data accessibility and speed are improved, but storage costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accessibilityVSAvoidstorage costs
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is segmented into multiple storage devices with different performance characteristics (fast/expensive and slow/cheap). Data is divided and distributed across these segments based on access patterns, allowing frequently accessed data to reside on fast storage while less frequently accessed data moves to slow storage, resolving the contradiction between speed and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically moves data between fast and slow storage devices based on changing access patterns and policies. Data that was previously accessed frequently may be moved to slow storage after a certain period, while recently accessed data is moved back to fast storage, allowing the system to adapt to varying workloads and optimize the balance between speed and cost over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If data is moved to less expensive storage devices, then storage costs are reduced, but data access speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage costsVSAvoiddata access speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting which data will be needed in the future and pre-loading it into fast storage before it is actually requested. This anticipatory approach ensures that when data is accessed, it is already in the fast storage layer, maintaining high access speeds while allowing the system to keep slower storage devices utilized for cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the distribution of data between fast and slow storage based on real-time and historical access patterns. By continuously monitoring and adapting data placement, the system ensures that data access speed requirements are met while minimizing storage costs through efficient use of slower, cheaper storage resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If data is replicated from primary to secondary storage system, then data availability is improved, but storage resource usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidstorage resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates copies of data and places them in different storage locations (primary and secondary storage systems). This copying approach ensures data availability and reliability by having redundant copies, while the system intelligently manages the replication process to optimize storage resource usage based on policies and access patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Different qualities of storage are assigned to different data based on local requirements. Critical data that requires high availability is replicated across multiple systems, while less critical data may be stored only in the primary system. This differentiated approach optimizes both reliability and storage resource usage by applying replication selectively rather than uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7636704B2Methods and apparatus for scheduling an action on a computer
Publication Date: 2009.12.22 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US7636704B2 patent drawing
  • US7636704B2 patent drawing
  • US7636704B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment is directed to a computer system that includes primary and secondary storage systems. When a request to store a content unit is received, it may be determined whether to store the content unit on the primary storage system or the secondary storage system. In another embodiment, a computer may store information relating to an action to be performed in one of the directories of a file system that corresponds to a period of time. When the period of time to which the directory corresponds arrives, the action may be performed. In another embodiment, a content unit stored on a primary storage system may be copied to a secondary storage system in a computer system. After the content unit has been copied, the secondary storage system may send a delete request to the primary storage system to delete the content unit from the primary storage system.