Storage System Host-Activated Defragmentation Threshold

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data storage devices experience performance degradation over time due to physical fragmentation in memory, leading to severe performance issues when memory blocks are occupied with partial valid data and lack free blocks, which existing host-activated defragmentation and proactive garbage collection processes often address but can be destructive to memory wear and performance optimization.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic block valid count threshold for host-activated defragmentation and proactive garbage collection, allowing the host to control which memory blocks participate in defragmentation, optimizing performance while managing the write amplification factor and memory lifetime by configuring the threshold via a dedicated command.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If host-activated defragmentation and proactive garbage collection are performed to maintain performance, then memory fragmentation is reduced and free blocks are increased, but memory wear increases and write amplification factor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistencyVSAvoidmemory wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the block valid count threshold based on memory wear levels and usage patterns. When memory wear is high, the threshold is raised to reduce defragmentation activity; when wear is low and performance degrades, the threshold is lowered to increase defragmentation. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the defragmentation intensity to current memory conditions, maintaining performance consistency while controlling memory wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the defragmentation process adaptive rather than static. The block valid count threshold is not fixed but changes dynamically based on monitored parameters including memory wear indicators, usage patterns, and performance metrics. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize between performance maintenance and wear reduction in real-time, resolving the technical contradiction through continuous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If aggressive defragmentation is performed to eliminate memory fragmentation, then performance is improved, but write amplification factor increases and memory lifetime is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite performanceVSAvoidmemory lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing defragmentation selectively rather than aggressively on all memory blocks. The block valid count threshold determines which blocks undergo defragmentation, and this threshold is adjusted to perform only the necessary minimum defragmentation needed to maintain performance. This partial approach resolves the contradiction by achieving sufficient performance improvement without the excessive wear and write amplification caused by aggressive defragmentation of all blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If defragmentation is performed during host write operations to maintain performance, then memory organization is improved, but host write performance suffers due to foreground operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory organizationVSAvoidhost write speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by scheduling defragmentation operations during idle periods rather than continuously during host writes. The system monitors host activity and performs defragmentation when the host is not actively writing data, ensuring memory organization is maintained without interfering with host write performance. This periodic approach resolves the contradiction by decoupling defragmentation timing from host write operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively performing defragmentation during idle time before the host needs to write data, ensuring memory is well-organized in advance. This prevents performance degradation before it occurs, resolving the contradiction by maintaining memory organization through advance action rather than reactive defragmentation during writes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11972149B2Storage system and method for optimizing host-activated defragmentation and proactive garbage collection processes
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11972149B2 patent drawing
  • US11972149B2 patent drawing
  • US11972149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage system is provided that performs a defragmentation operation or proactive garbage collection in its memory based on a command from a host. The command specifies which blocks in the memory should take part in the defragmentation operation by specifying a maximum amount of valid data that a block can have to qualify for defragmentation. That way, the storage system only performs defragmentation on those blocks that meet the validity criteria provided by the host. This can help improve performance of the storage system while reducing the degree of negative tradeoffs that may come with defragmentation or proactive garbage collection.