Storage Drive Purchase Prediction via Usage Trend Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual purchase decisions for data storage devices are often made too late due to a lack of awareness about storage media nuances, leading to reactionary approaches and inefficiencies in predicting when additional storage capacity is needed, especially in complex systems with multiple interacting components.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that continuously monitors data storage usage and behavior to predict trends, calculate statistical models, and transmit recommendations for additional storage drives, including type, size, and timing of purchases, to ensure timely upgrades and replacements before system capacity issues arise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual monitoring and purchase decisions are used, then human judgment and experience can be applied, but purchase decisions are made too late and in response to emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to predict storage needsVSAvoidautomation of purchase prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring storage usage trends and calculating projected lifetime values before storage devices actually reach capacity or fail. This allows purchase decisions to be made in advance rather than in emergency situations, resolving the contradiction by automating early detection and prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring operational data from storage devices, comparing actual usage against predicted trends, and adjusting predictions accordingly. This automated feedback loop enables timely purchase decisions without requiring manual intervention, addressing both the timing and automation aspects of the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring and automated prediction is implemented, then timely purchase predictions can be made, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of storage systemVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by enabling storage devices to monitor their own operational parameters and generate predictions about their remaining useful life. Each storage device essentially serves itself by providing its own operational data and participating in the collective prediction model, reducing the need for complex external monitoring infrastructure while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If detailed operational data is collected and analyzed, then accurate predictions can be made, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of storage trend predictionVSAvoidenergy for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively monitoring and analyzing only the most critical operational parameters that have the greatest impact on predicting storage device lifetime. Rather than processing all possible data with equal depth, the system focuses computational resources on the most predictive metrics, achieving accurate predictions while minimizing energy consumption for data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10146449B1Purchase planning for data storage processing systems
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10146449B1 patent drawing
  • US10146449B1 patent drawing
  • US10146449B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique of automatically predicting data storage configuration events, such as purchase decisions, based upon individual data storage drive properties, client storage usage and behavior trends is described. The behavior trends may include customer actions, such as deleting snap shots or otherwise deleting data, typical ordering times and delays, and expected installation and acceptance testing times. The technique collects operational data and calculates statistical trends. The technique automatically notifies a data storage system manager of the calculated data when the operational data indicates that the data storage system will need reconfiguration and recommends data storage drive properties to acquire.