Storage System Event Gauge Using Exponential Decay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Storage systems face significant memory allocation challenges due to the high frequency of events and the need for accurate rate monitoring, leading to excessive memory usage and resource consumption in managing multiple counters for event gauges.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a single gauge variable to approximate the average rate of events over a sliding time window, updating the gauge value exponentially based on time differences and event occurrences, eliminating the need for multiple counters and reducing memory usage by simulating the decay and contribution of events over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple counters are used to monitor event rates accurately over a sliding time window, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent rate monitoring accuracyVSAvoidnumber of counters
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual counters into a single aggregate counter that tracks total events. Instead of maintaining separate counters for each timeslot within the sliding window, the invention uses one counter to accumulate all events and combines this with exponential decay weighting to compute the weighted average rate, thereby reducing complexity while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter representation from discrete timeslot counters to a continuous exponential decay model. By using a single counter combined with exponential weighting factors that decay over time, the system transforms the approach from tracking individual timeslot counts to computing a weighted average based on event age, reducing the number of stored parameters while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple counters are maintained for each gauge in fast memory, then measurement precision is improved, but memory space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent rate monitoring accuracyVSAvoidmemory space
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple counters that would otherwise occupy separate memory locations into a single counter per gauge. This consolidation dramatically reduces the memory footprint from O(n) where n is the number of timeslots, to O(1) per gauge, while the exponential decay algorithm maintains the ability to compute accurate weighted averages over the sliding window period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the timeslot distinction from the memory structure and replaces it with temporal weighting applied during computation. Instead of storing separate counter values for each timeslot in memory, the system stores a single aggregate counter and applies exponential decay weights algorithmically, removing the need for large memory allocations while preserving the sliding window functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If counters are rearranged upon each timeslot lapse, then measurement precision is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent rate monitoring accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resources consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing and storing exponential decay weights or by using a mathematical formulation that avoids iterative rearrangement. Instead of physically rearranging counter data structures when timeslots lapse, the invention uses exponential decay mathematics to compute the weighted average directly from the current aggregate counter value and the elapsed time, eliminating the need for data movement and reducing computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical operation of rearranging counter arrays in memory with a mathematical computation based on exponential decay. Instead of moving data structures and reindexing counters when timeslots expire, the system uses a closed-form mathematical solution that computes the weighted average rate directly from the current counter value and time elapsed, substituting computational mathematics for data manipulation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10782650B1Gauge for monitoring instances of a storage system event
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 INFINIDAT LTD
  • US10782650B1 patent drawing
  • US10782650B1 patent drawing
  • US10782650B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for monitoring a storage system event, the method may include receiving, by a control unit of a storage system, a request to access a gauge that is associated with the storage system event; updating, by the control unit, a value of the gauge based on (a) a time difference between a time related to the request to access the gauge and a time related to a previous request to access the gauge, and (b) a length of a sliding time window; wherein when the request to access the gauge is triggered by an occurrence of an instance of the storage system event then the updating is further responsive to the occurrence of the instance of the storage system event; and wherein the value of the gauge provides an approximation of an average rate of instances of the storage system event during the sliding time window.